News Release

How well are alternative feedstuffs received by the end consumer?

Researchers at the University of Göttingen examine the effect of providing information

Peer-Reviewed Publication

University of Göttingen

chicken breasts

image: The research team presented the test subjects with chicken that had been fed, for example, spirulina algae. view more 

Credit: Dr Brianne Altmann

Despite shifts towards vegan and vegetarian diets in Western cultures, demand for animal protein persists. Alternative protein sources are required to nourish the growing world population without compromising on sustainability. Researchers at the University of Göttingen and the University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada, investigated consumer preferences of alternative feedstuffs. Specifically, the researchers looked at the effect of information regarding algae and insects in the food chain. The results were published in the journal Food Policy.

The researchers photographed chicken breasts from animals fed with spirulina or insect meal and rendered the photos to imitate market-ready products. The chicken breast products were labelled with health or sustainability claims to further understand preference motivation for alternative feedstuffs. Two groups of respondents (around 1000) then completed an online questionnaire, where they were shown two different chicken breast products and asked which one they would purchase. One group received the information available on the package, such as labelling and price. The other group received additional information regarding the feedstuffs and the feedstuffs were also identified on each product. Information on feedstuffs proved to be an important factor in influencing consumer preferences. Because spirulina drastically alters the colour of the end product, it is necessary to provide information to make these products marketable to consumers.

Surprisingly, the respondents liked the chicken breast reared with insect meal the most. However, when the feedstuff was identified, only sustainability-motivated consumers continued to prefer insects as a feedstuff. “Therefore, the incorporation of insects into feed for poultry should be conducted with full transparency for the end consumer and feedstuffs should be labelled in order to avoid future backlash or mistrust,” explains Dr Brianne Altmann, lead researcher. “However, the increased exposure through having these products available on the market will likely increase their acceptance.”

Although spirulina has a history of being used as a feedstuff in some cultures, it is currently cultivated as a health supplement and remains much more expensive than soybean meal. Insects on the other hand, have recently been certified for use in poultry feed in the European Union. “One drawback within the current legislation hindering the sustainability is that insects for feed must be reared on certified feedstuffs, putting insect rearing in direct competition for the rearing of other poultry and livestock,” says Altmann “In order to increase the uptake and sustainability of alternative feedstuffs, advances in production, such as growth in scale and the incorporation of waste products, are urgently needed.”

Original publication: Brianne A. Altmann, Sven Anders, Antje Risius, Daniel Mörlein: Information Effects on Consumer Preferences for Alternative Animal Feedstuffs (Food Policy). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102192 .

Available for free download until 15 January 2022 https://authors.elsevier.com/a/1e8bV15oGp97ts  

 

Contact:

Dr Brianne Altmann
University of Göttingen
Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Animal Sciences
Quality of Animal Products
Kellnerweg 6, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
Tel: +49 (0)551 39-25611
Email: brianne.altmann@agr.uni-goettingen.de
www.uni-goettingen.de/en/86980.html

 

Professor Daniel Mörlein
University of Göttingen
Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Animal Sciences
Quality of Animal Products
Kellnerweg 6, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
Email: daniel.moerlein@uni-goettingen.de

 


Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.