Unveiling the subtle influence of rootstocks on grapevine growth and wine quality: A 30-year x-ray imaging study
image: Grapevine rings and scion trunk radii.
Credit: Horticulture Research
Grafting, the union of rootstock and scion to form a single organism with vascular connections, is a critical technique for agriculture, especially in woody perennials like grapevines. Despite the benefits such as disease resistance, drought tolerance, and improved fruit quality, the environmental factors still predominantly dictate grapevine traits. Challenges in optimising graft outcomes, including the Ravaz index, which balances yield and vine management. Furthermore, wood anatomy and hydraulic conductivity are significantly influenced by grafting, with implications for drought resistance and overall plant health. However, the complexity of interactions between grafted components and their environment is not fully understood. The precise role of grafting in shaping wood anatomy and its subsequent impact on vine physiology and productivity, particularly how rootstock-scion compatibility and alignment affect secondary growth, represents a critical area for future research.
In October 2022, Horticulture Research published a perspective entitled “X-ray imaging of 30 year old wine grape wood reveals cumulative impacts of rootstocks on scion secondary growth and Ravaz index”.
In this study, X-ray Computed Tomography was employed to investigate how 15 different rootstocks affect the secondary growth of 30-year-old Chardonnay and Cabernet Sauvignon grapevines. First, researchers applied a model that incorporated scion and rootstock variables to predict the scion trunk radius. This model revealed that scion accounted for 46.53% of the variation, rootstock for 16.57%, and their interaction for just 2.42%. Additionally, within the same scion type, rootstock significantly altered the scion trunk radius range, with a notable 143% and 129% difference between the widest and narrowest trunk radii conferred by specific rootstocks in Chardonnay and Cabernet Sauvignon respectively. Additionally, the study utilized a negative exponential model to explore how scion and rootstock influence ring width across the scion trunk. Changes in the model parameters (A, B, and k) indicated that A influenced overall ring width, B the early rings' width, and k the rate at which ring width approached the asymptote. Notably, Cabernet Sauvignon consistently had wider ring widths compared to Chardonnay. The significance of the scion and rootstock on these parameters varied, with rootstock showing a significant effect on the decay parameter k, explaining 22.68% of the variation. Additionally, the study correlated various traits with ring features, using a large dataset that spanned different years. The Ravaz index and juice pH were found to be robustly correlated with ring and trunk widths. The Ravaz index, in particular, was negatively correlated with scion trunk radius, suggesting that larger trunks correspond to lower yields relative to pruning weight. Finally, the study measured physiological traits, including assimilation rate, transpiration rate, and water use efficiency (WUEi), across different rootstocks to determine the effect of scion trunk radius on vine physiology. The findings suggested that vines with wider trunks had higher rates of assimilation and transpiration but decreased water use efficiency. Leaf temperature, however, did not show a significant correlation with scion trunk radius.
In conclusion, this study demonstrates that rootstocks play a critical role in the vine's adaptation to genetic and environmental factors. The ability to modulate vegetative growth and yield through rootstock choice holds the potential for advancing grape cultivation, informing vineyard management practices, and optimizing fruit and wine quality in woody perennial crop species.
###
References
Authors
Zoë Migicovsky1,†, Michelle Y. Quigley2, Joey Mullins2, Tahira Ali3,4, Joel F. Swift5, Anita Rose Agasaveeran6, Joseph D. Dougherty7,8, Brendan Michael Grant9,10, Ilayda Korkmaz3,11, Maneesh Reddy Malpeddi9,10, Emily L. McNichol8,7, Andrew W. Sharp12,7, Jackie L. Harris13, Danielle R. Hopkins13, Lindsay M. Jordan13,14, Misha T. Kwasniewski15, R. Keith Striegler13, Asia L. Dowtin16, Stephanie Stotts17,18, Peter Cousins19 and Daniel H. Chitwood2,7*
Affiliations
1. Plant, Food, and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Dalhousie University, Truro, Nova Scotia, B2N 5E3, Canada
2. Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48823, USA
3. College of Natural Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48823, USA
4. Department of Neuroscience, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48823, USA
5. Department of Biology, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, 63103, USA
6. Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48823, USA
7. Department of Computational Mathematics, Science & Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48823, USA
8. College of Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48823, USA
9. College of Social Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48823, USA
10. Department of Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48823, USA
11. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48823, USA
12. College of Arts and Letters, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48823, USA
13. E. & J. Gallo Winery, Acampo, CA, 95220, USA
14. Current affiliation: Constellation Brands, Soledad, CA, 93960, USA
15. Department of Food Science, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, 16803, USA
16. Department of Forestry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48823, USA
17. Department of Agriculture, Food, and Resource Sciences, University of Maryland Eastern Shore, Princess Anne, MD, 21853, USA
18. Department of Natural Sciences, University of Maryland Eastern Shore, Princess Anne, MD, 21853, USA
19. E. & J. Gallo Winery, Modesto, CA, 95354, USA
†Current Affiliation: Department of Biology, Acadia University, Wolfville, Nova Scotia, B4P 2R6, Canada
About Daniel H. Chitwood
He is an associate professor in the Department of Horticulture at Michigan State University. His lab focuses on using X-ray CT and analysis using TDA to explore plant morphology, development, and plasticity, and to innovate new ways of thinking about, describing, quantifying, and using shape information in the plant sciences and beyond.