News Release

Human crowds are best modeled by a ‘visual neighborhood’

Peer-Reviewed Publication

PNAS Nexus

Human swarm experiment

image: Human Swarm experiment:  (a) Groups of 10 to 20 participants were asked to walk around a large hall, turning left and right while staying together as a group. Their head positions were recorded with 16 motion-capture cameras   (b) Head trajectories were reconstructed using a computer program.  The visual model predicted the trajectories of individual participants, using the visible motions of their neighbors as input. view more 

Credit: William Warren

Human crowd dynamics are best predicted by a visual neighborhood model, based on the visual fields of each person in the crowd. Birds flock, fish school, and human crowds, too, move in a collective motion pattern. Understanding human crowd behavior can be useful for preventing jams, crushes, and stampedes. Mathematical models of collective motion are typically based on characterizing the local interactions between individuals. One popular approach, called a metric model, is to quantify forces of attraction, repulsion, and velocity alignment for all neighbors within a fixed radius from the focal individual. Alternatively, in a topological model the focal individual might be influenced by a fixed number of near neighbors, regardless of the distance to the focal individual. Trenton Wirth and colleagues asked participants to walk in real and virtual crowds of varying densities, then changed the walking direction of some neighbors to see how the participants responded. The authors found that the data produced was better predicted by the metric model than by the topological model. But the best model was based on the visual motions of the neighbors the focal individual could see. In dense crowds, near neighbors may partially or completely block the view of more distant neighbors, removing the distant neighbors from the focal pedestrian’s input. Pursuing a visual model promises more realistic simulations of crowd dynamics, according to the authors. 


Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.