image: 3D Patient Tumor Avatars (3D-PTAs) are part of a proposed integrative platform to provide optimal treatment selections for cancer patients. Such a platform combines omics and 3D-PTA data with standardized criteria and prospective clinical trial designs. view more
Credit: Terasaki Institute for Biomedical Innovation
(LOS ANGELES) – December 20, 2022 - At any time, most cancer patients are receiving a treatment that does not significantly benefit them while enduring bodily and financial toxicity. Aiming to guide each patient to the most optimal treatment, precision medicine has been expanding from genetic mutations to other drivers of clinical outcome. There has been a concerted effort to create “avatars” of patient tumors for testing and selecting therapies before administering them into patients.
A recently published Cancer Cell paper, which represents several National Cancer Institute consortia and includes key opinion leaders from both the research and clinical sectors in the United States and Europe, laid out the vision for next-generation, functional precision medicine by recommending measures to enable 3D patient tumor avatars (3D-PTAs) to guide treatment decisions in the clinic. According to Dr. Xiling Shen, the corresponding author of this article and the chief scientific officer of the Terasaki Institute for Biomedical Innovation, the power of 3D-PTAs, which include patient-derived organoids, 3D bioprinting, and microscale models, lie in their accurate real-life depiction of a tumor with its microenvironment and their speed and scalability to test and predict the efficacy of prospective therapeutic drugs. To fully realize this aim and maximize clinical accuracy, however, many steps are needed to standardize methods and criteria, design clinical trials, and incorporate complete patient data for the best possible outcome in personalized care.
The use of such tools and resources can involve a great variety of materials, methods, and handling of data, however, and to ensure the accuracy and integrity for any clinical decision making, major efforts are needed to aggregate, standardize, and validate the uses of 3D-PTAs. Attempts by the National Cancer Institute’s Patient-Derived Models of Cancer Consortium and other groups have initiated official protocol standardizations, and much work needs to be done.
The authors emphasize that in addition to unifying and standardizing protocols over a widespread number of research facilities, there must be quantification using validated software pipelines, and information must be codified and shared amongst all the research groups involved. They also recommend that more extensive and far-reaching clinical patient profile be compiled, which encompass every facet of a patient’s history, including not only medical, but demographic information as well; these are important factors in patient outcome. To achieve standardization in this regard, regulatory infrastructure provided by the National Institutes of Health and other institutes and journals must also be included to allow reliable global data sharing and access.
Clinical trials are also a major part of the 3D-PTA effort, and to date, studies have been conducted to examine clinical trial workflows and turnaround times using 3D-PTA. The authors advise innovative clinical trial designs that can help with selecting patients for specific trials or custom treatments, especially when coupled with the patient’s clinical and demographic information.
Combining these patient omics profiles with information in 3D-PTA functional data libraries can be facilitated by well-defined computational pipelines, and the authors advocate the utilization of relevant consortia, such as NCI Patient-Derived Model of Cancer Program, PDXnet, Tissue Engineering Collaborative, and Cancer Systems Biology Centers as well as European research infrastructure such as INFRAFRONTIER, EuroPDX)
Integrating data from existing 3D-PTA initiatives, consortia, and biobanks with omics profiles can bring precision medicine to a new level, providing enhanced vehicles for making optimum choices among approved therapeutic drugs, as well as investigational, alternative, non-chemotherapeutic drugs. It can also provide solutions for patients experiencing drug resistance and expand opportunities for drug repurposing.
“The integration of the 3D-PTA platform is a game-changing tool for oncological drug development,” said Ali Khademhosseini, Director and CEO for the Terasaki Institute for Biomedical Innovation. “We must combine it in a robust fashion with existing cancer genomics to produce the most powerful paradigm for precision oncology.”
Authors are: Shree Bose, Margarida Barroso, Milan G. Chheda, Hans Clevers, Elena Elez, Salma Kaochar, Scott E. Kopetz, Xiao-Nan Li, Funda Meric-Bernstam, Clifford A. Meyer, Haiwei Mou, Kristen M. Naegle, Martin F. Pera, Zinaida Perova, Katerina A. Politi, Benjamin J. Raphael, Paul Robson, Rosalie C. Sears, Josep Tabernero, David A. Tuveson, Alana L. Welm, Bryan E. Welm, Christopher D. Willey, Konstantin Salnikow29, Jeffrey H. Chuang, Xiling Shen.
Journal
Cancer Cell
Method of Research
Commentary/editorial
Subject of Research
Not applicable
Article Title
A path to translation: How 3D patient tumor avatars enable next-generation precision oncology
Article Publication Date
20-Oct-2022
COI Statement
S.E.K. is an advisor to Xilis, Inc. F.M.B. declares consulting/advisory fees 312 from AbbVie, Aduro BioTech Inc., Alkermes, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo Co. Ltd., 313 DebioPharm, eFFECTOR Therapeutics, F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd., Genentech Inc., Harbinger 314 Health, IBM Watson, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Jackson Laboratory, Kolon Life Science, Lengo 315 Therapeutics, OrigiMed, PACT Pharma, Parexel International, Pfizer Inc., Protai Bio Ltd, 316 Samsung Bioepis, Seattle Genetics Inc., Tallac Therapeutics, Tyra Biosciences, Xencor, 317 Zymeworks, Black Diamond, Biovica, Eisai, FogPharma, Immunomedics, Inflection 318 Biosciences, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Loxo Oncology, Mersana Therapeutics, OnCusp 319 Therapeutics, Puma Biotechnology Inc., Seattle Genetics, Sanofi, Silverback Therapeutics, 320 Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Zentalis; sponsored research to her institution from Aileron 321 Therapeutics, Inc. AstraZeneca, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceutical, Calithera Biosciences Inc., 322 Curis Inc., CytomX Therapeutics Inc., Daiichi Sankyo Co. Ltd., Debiopharm International, 323 eFFECTOR Therapeutics, Genentech Inc., Guardant Health Inc., Klus Pharma, Takeda 324 Pharmaceutical, Novartis, Puma Biotechnology Inc., Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. and honoraria for 325 a speaking engagement from Chugai Biopharmaceuticals. S.K. is a consultant for FGH BioTech 326 and has received research funding from FGH BioTech and Systems Oncology. K.A.P. is co327 inventor on a patent for EGFRT790M mutation testing issued, licensed, and with royalties paid 328 from Molecular Diagnostics/Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. She reports research 329 funding to the institution from AstraZeneca; Roche/Genentech, Boehringer Ingelheim, and D2G 330 Oncology; and consulting for AstraZeneca and Jannssen. M.G.C. reports grants from 331 NeoImmuneTech, as well as other support from Orbus Therapeutics, Incyte, Merck, and 332 UpToDate outside the submitted work; in addition, M.G.C. has a patent for Zika virus strains for 333 the treatment of glioblastoma pending. E.E.’s full disclosures are given here: 334 www.bit.ly/3xuWMer. J.T. reports personal financial interest in form of scientific consultancy 335 role for Array Biopharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, 336 F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Genentech Inc, HalioDX SAS, Hutchison MediPharma 337 International, Ikena Oncology, Inspirna Inc, IQVIA, Lilly, Menarini, Merck Serono, Merus, 338 MSD, Mirati, Neophore, Novartis, Ona Therapeutics, Orion Biotechnology, Peptomyc, Pfizer, 339 Pierre Fabre, Samsung Bioepis, Sanofi, Scandion Oncology, Scorpion Therapeutics, Seattle 340 Genetics, Servier, Sotio Biotech, Taiho, Tessa Therapeutics and TheraMyc. Stocks: Oniria 341 Therapeutics and educational collaboration with Imedex/HMP, Medscape Education, MJH 342 Life Sciences, PeerView Institute for Medical Education and Physicians Education Resource 343 (PER). D.A.T. is a member of the Scientific Advisory Board and receives stock options from 344 Leap Therapeutics, Surface Oncology, Cygnal Therapeutics, Mestag Therapeutics and Xilis, Inc. 345 outside the submitted work. D.A.T. is scientific co-founder of Mestag Therapeutics. D.A.T. has 346 received research grant support from Fibrogen, Mestag, and ONO Therapeutics. D.A.T. receives 347 grant funding from the Lustgarten Foundation, the NIH, and the Thompson Foundation. None of 348 this work is related to the publication. No other disclosures were reported. C.D.W. is a part-time 349 consultant for LifeNet Health and receives grant funding from AACR-Novocure and Varian 350 Medical Systems. X.S. and H.C. are cofounders of Xilis, Inc. and inventors on patents related to 351 organoid research and micro-organospheres. X.S. is CEO of Xilis, Inc. H.C.’s full disclosure is 352 given here: www.uu.nl/staff/JCClevers/Additionalfunctions