Membrane bioreactor performs better than the conventional activated sludge process in techno-economy

To better achieve environmental goals, a growing number of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are being retrofitted from the conventional activated sludge (CAS) process to the membrane bioreactor (MBR) process due to MBR’s small footprint and high effluent quality. However, retrofitting from CAS to MBR has been controversial due to the high energy consumption and membrane fouling in MBR applications. It is essential to clarify this issue by comparing the techno-economy of CAS with that of MBR.

On the one hand, energy consumption accounts for the largest proportion of operating costs and is a key factor restricting the sustainable development of wastewater treatment processes. MBR normally has higher energy consumption than that of CAS. On the other hand, high costs are often associated with high returns. MBR obtains higher environmental benefit from higher effluent quality than CAS. Therefore, a justified techno-economic assessment of MBR vs. CAS requires comprehensively considering both economic costs and environmental benefits. However, the previously reported techno-economic evaluation of WWTPs mostly lacked a systematic comparison between the CAS and MBR processes, especially a strict paired comparison between them in the same WWTP.

Now, a research group from the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences studied the techno-economic characteristics of 20 full-scale WWTPs that had been retrofitted from CAS to MBR via the cost-benefit analysis and data envelopment analysis. The results were published in Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering.

They found that after the retrofitting from CAS to MBR, the effluent quality improved significantly, accompanied by an increase in energy consumption from 0.40 to 0.57 kWh/m³, while the change in operating cost was not such significant. The average marginal environmental benefit increased remarkably after the retrofitting, leading to an increase in the average net profit, which indicates the techno-economic feasibility of the retrofitting. After the retrofitting, the relative cost efficiency increased from 0.70 to 0.73 (the theoretical maximum is 1), while the relative energy efficiency did not change significantly. Meanwhile, the techno-economy is closely related to the effluent standard adopted. MBR is more profitable than CAS given stricter effluent standards.

Therefore, just as the researchers considered, MBR performs better than CAS in cases of strict effluent standards and pollutant-sensitive destinations, and there is still much room for further reducing the energy consumption of MBR.

###

About Higher Education Press

Founded in May 1954, Higher Education Press Limited Company (HEP), affiliated with the Ministry of Education, is one of the earliest institutions committed to educational publishing after the establishment of P. R. China in 1949. After striving for six decades, HEP has developed into a major comprehensive publisher, with products in various forms and at different levels. Both for import and export, HEP has been striving to fill in the gap of domestic and foreign markets and meet the demand of global customers by collaborating with more than 200 partners throughout the world and selling products and services in 32 languages globally. Now, HEP ranks among China's top publishers in terms of copyright export volume and the world's top 50 largest publishing enterprises in terms of comprehensive strength.

The Frontiers Journals series published by HEP includes 28 English academic journals, covering the largest academic fields in China at present. Among the series, 13 have been indexed by SCI, 6 by EI, 2 by MEDLINE, 1 by A&HCI. HEP's academic monographs have won about 300 different kinds of publishing funds and awards both at home and abroad.

About Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering

Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering (FESE) is the leading edge forum for peer-reviewed original submissions in English on all main branches of environmental disciplines. FESE welcomes original research papers, review articles, short communications, and views & comments. All the papers will be published within 6 months since they are submitted. The Editors-in-Chief are Academician Jiuhui Qu from Tsinghua University, and Prof. John C. Crittenden from Georgia Institute of Technology, USA. The journal has been indexed by almost all the authoritative databases such as SCI, Ei, INSPEC, SCOPUS, CSCD, etc.