HIV drug stabilizes disease progression in metastatic colorectal cancer

BOSTON — New clinical research shows that lamivudine, a reverse transcriptase inhibitor widely used in HIV therapy, stopped disease progression in 25% of patients with fourth-line metastatic colorectal cancer. Findings from the trial, published in Cancer Discovery, raise the possibility of an unexpected promising direction in cancer treatment, not just colorectal cancer.

The trial included 32 patients with advanced metastatic colon cancer whose disease progressed despite four lines of previous cancer treatments. The first nine patients received the standard HIV-approved dose of lamivudine. “After giving them only this one drug – nothing else – we saw signs of disease stability,” says co-senior author David T. Ting, MD, of the Mass General Cancer Center. After adjusting the dosing four-fold, another 23 patients received lamivudine therapy where it was highly tolerated.

The research team observed that 9 of the 32 patients, or 28%, had disease stability or mixed response at the end of the trial. “This provides evidence that an HIV drug can be repurposed as an anti-cancer therapy in metastatic cancer patients,” says Ting. While the research team did not see tumor shrinkage, the results are encouraging.

“If we see this kind of response with just one HIV drug, the next obvious trial is to see what else we can achieve with HAART, or highly active anti-retroviral therapy,” adds Ting, referring to the standard three-drug regime for HIV treatment.

The first clues to this unusual drug trial surfaced in Ting’s lab and those of his collaborators over the past ten years. The team discovered that up to 50% of a tumor’s DNA was composed of “repetitive elements”, which were previously considered “junk DNA”. “Only cancer cells produced these repetitive element, not healthy cells,” says Ting. Colorectal cancers produce abundant amounts of repetitive elements, as do cancers of the esophagus, lung, and several others. These repetitive elements spew out extraordinary levels of RNA which replicate in a viral-like life cycle through reverse transcription into what Ting describes at the repeatome.

The repeatome acts much like a virus does relying on reverse transcription to replicate itself and move in the genome. “It’s a way for cancers to change their genome to adapt to stress,” adds Ting, who had the idea to assess whether an HIV drug, lamivudine, might interfere with the process.

In their preclinical studies, Ting found that colorectal cancer cells were sensitive to lamivudine, reducing their ability to move. The team also discovered that the drug induced DNA damage and interferon responses, an indication that the drug triggered an inflammatory response in the tumor cells. Although not proven or evaluated in this trial, Ting theorizes that pairing reverse transcriptase inhibitor therapy with immunotherapy might encourage immune cells to become involved in these cancers.

Research shows that in a U.S. population of HIV patients receiving three-drug anti-retroviral therapy for life, their incidence of colon, breast, and prostate cancer was significantly less than the general population. Ting speculates this kind of therapy might prevent a cancer or a recurrence or turn a crushing metastatic disease into a chronic disease like HIV.

“We did the trial to see if we could learn something new about the biology of cancer cells and in the process found this unexpected, very encouraging result,” says Ting. “Disease stability in a cancer patient population this advanced, with just one single agent, is highly unusual and we are hoping we can soon initiate a larger Phase III study with a three-drug reverse transcriptase inhibitor combination.”

This work was supported with grants from the National Institutes of Health, Gateway for Cancer Research, Stand Up To Cancer (SU2C), National Science Foundation, Burroughs Wellcome Fund, V Foundation for Cancer Research, Affymetrix, Inc., ACD-Biotechne, Robert L. Fine Cancer Research Foundation, and the Pershing Square Sohn Prize—Mark Foundation Fellowship.

Other authors of the study include Mihir Rajurkar, Aparna R. Parikh, Alexander Solovyov, Eunae You, Anupriya S.Kulkarni, Chong Chu, Katherine H. Xu, Christopher Jaicks, Martin S. Taylor, Connie Wu, Katherine A. Alexander, Charly R. Good, Annamaria Szabolcs, Stefanie Gerstberger, Antuan V. Tran, Nova Xu, Richard Y. Ebright, Emily E. Van Seventer, Kevin D. Vo, Eric C. Tai, Chenyue Lu, Jasmin Joseph-Chazan, Michael J. Raabe, Linda T. Nieman, Niyati Desai, Kshitij S. Arora, Matteo Ligorio, Vishal Thapar, Limor Cohen, Padric M. Garden,

Yasmeen Senussi, Hui Zheng, Jill N. Allen, Lawrence S. Blaszkowsky, Jeffrey W. Clark, Lipika Goyal, Jennifer Y. Wo, David P. Ryan, Ryan B. Corcoran, Vikram Deshpande, Miguel N. Rivera, Martin J. Aryee, Theodore S. Hong, Shelley L. Berger, David R. Walt, Kathleen H. Burns, Peter J. Park, and Benjamin D. Greenbaum.

About the Massachusetts General Hospital
Massachusetts General Hospital, founded in 1811, is the original and largest teaching hospital of Harvard Medical School. The Mass General Research Institute conducts the largest hospital-based research program in the nation, with annual research operations of more than $1 billion and comprises more than 9,500 researchers working across more than 30 institutes, centers and departments. In August 2021, Mass General was named #5 in the U.S. News & World Report list of “America’s Best Hospitals.” MGH is a founding member of the Mass General Brigham health care system.