Supercomputer and quantum simulations solve a difficult problem of materials science

Ishikawa, Japan -- Understanding the structural properties of molecules found in nature or synthesized in the laboratory has always been the bread and butter of materials scientists. But, with advancements in science and technology, the endeavor has become even more ambitious: discovering new materials with highly desirable properties. To accomplish such a feat systematically, materials scientists rely upon sophisticated simulation techniques that incorporate the rules of quantum mechanics, the same rules which govern the molecules themselves.

The simulation-based approach has been remarkably successful, so much so that an entire field of study called materials informatics has been dedicated to it. But there have also been instances of failure. A notable example comes from disiloxane, a silicon (Si)-containing compound consisting of a Si-O-Si bridge with three hydrogen atoms at each end. The structure is simple enough, and yet it has been notoriously difficult to estimate just how much energy is needed to bend the Si-O-Si bridge. Experimental results have been inconsistent and theoretical calculations have yielded widely different values due to the sensitivity of the calculated properties to parameter choices and level of theory.

Fortunately, an international research team led by Dr. Kenta Hongo, Associate Professor at Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, has now managed to solve this problem. In their study published in Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, the team achieved this feat by using a state-of-the-art simulation technique called “first-principles quantum Monte Carlo method” that finally overcame the difficulties other standard techniques could not surmount.

But does it all just boil down to better simulations? Not quite. “Getting an answer that does not agree with the experimentally known value is, in itself, not surprising. The agreement can improve with more careful, and more expensive, simulations. But with disiloxane, the agreement actually becomes worse with more careful simulations,” explains Dr. Hongo. “What our method has achieved, rather, is good results without much dependence on the adjustment parameters, so that we don’t need to worry about whether the adjusted values are sufficient.”

The team compared the first-principles quantum Monte Carlo approach with other standard techniques, such as “density functional theory” (DFT) calculations and “coupled cluster method with single and double substitutions and noniterative triples” (CCSD(T)), along with empirical measurements from previous studies. The three methods differed mainly in their sensitivity towards the “completeness” of basis sets (a set of functions used to define the quantum wavefunctions).

It turned out that for DFT and CCSD(T), the choice of basis set affected the amplitude as well as positions of zero amplitude for the wavefunctions, while for quantum Monte Carlo, it only affected the zero amplitude positions. This allowed one to tweak the amplitude such that the wavefunction shape approached that of an exact solution. “This self-healing property of the amplitude works well to reduce the basis-set dependence and lower the bias arising from an incomplete basis set in calculating the bending energy barrier,” elaborates Dr. Hongo.

While this is an exciting development in itself, Prof. Hongo points out the bigger picture. “Molecular simulations are widely used to design new medicines and catalysts. Getting rid of the fundamental difficulties in using them greatly contributes to the design of such materials. With our powerful supercomputers, the method used in our study could be a standard strategy for overcoming such difficulties,” he says.

This is indeed deserving of being called a “quantum leap”!

###

Reference

About Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Japan

Founded in 1990 in Ishikawa prefecture, the Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (JAIST) was the first independent national graduate school in Japan. Now, after 30 years of steady progress, JAIST has become one of Japan’s top-ranking universities. JAIST counts with multiple satellite campuses and strives to foster capable leaders with a state-of-the-art education system where diversity is key; about 40% of its alumni are international students. The university has a unique style of graduate education based on a carefully designed coursework-oriented curriculum to ensure that its students have a solid foundation on which to carry out cutting-edge research. JAIST also works closely both with local and overseas communities by promoting industry–academia collaborative research.

About Associate Professor Kenta Hongo from Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Japan

Kenta Hongo is an Associate Professor at the Research Centre for Advanced Computing Infrastructure at Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (JAIST). His research interests include Materials Simulations and Materials Informatics, which combines materials science and computer simulations to predict novel materials with desirable properties. He currently heads the Hongo Lab at JAIST. Dr. Hongo has 105 publications with over 1000 citations to his credit. For more details, visit: https://www.jaist.ac.jp/english/areas/ee/laboratory/hongo.html

Funding information

The study was funded by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences, under contract DEAC05-00OR22725, MEXT-KAKENHI (JP16KK0097, JP19H04692, and JP21K03400), FLAGSHIP2020 (project nos. hp190169 and hp190167 at Kcomputer), the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSRAOARD/FA2386-17-1-4049;FA2386-19-1-4015), JSPS Bilateral Joint Projects (with India DST), the HPCI System Research Project (Project ID: hp210019, hp210131, and jh210045), MEXT-KAKENHI (JP16H06439, JP17K17762, JP19K05029, JP19H05169, and JP21K03400), the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (Award Numbers: FA2386-20-1-4036), the JSPS Overseas Research Fellowships, a Grant-in-Aid for Early-Career Scientists (Grant Number JP21K17752), and a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research(C) (Grant Number JP21K03400).