Patients with multiple sclerosis show robust T-cell responses to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines

PHILADELPHIA— New research shows that Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients undergoing anti-CD20 (aCD20) treatment – which depletes the B cells that contribute to the MS attacks – are able to mount robust T-cell responses to the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, despite having a muted antibody response to the vaccines.

Because B cells are responsible for antibody production, patients’ ability to produce antibodies that prevent the virus from entering and infecting a person’s cells is significantly muted when the B cells are depleted with aCD20 treatment. But the same patients are nonetheless able to mount very good responses of the second protective arm of their immune system, which uses T cells to eliminate cells once infected (thereby preventing viral spread to other cells), according to new research from the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania in a new paper published in Nature Medicine.

“The message from this study is clear – it is worthwhile for patients with MS receiving aCD20 treatment to get a COVID-19 vaccine, which will prevent severe illness,” said one of the senior authors E. John Wherry, PhD, chair of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics and director of the Penn Institute for Immunology. “Based on this body of evidence, we urge patients with MS receiving aCD20 treatment to get a COVID-19 vaccine if they haven’t already.”

The study measured both the antibody and T cell responses in 20 patients with MS who were undergoing aCD20 treatment, compared to those in a group of healthy controls. None of the participants in the study had prior clinical signs or symptoms of COVID-19. Researchers analyzed plasma and peripheral blood mononuclear cell samples five times over the study period: prior to the first vaccine dose, 10-12 days following the first vaccine dose, prior to the second vaccine dose, 10-12 days following the second vaccine dose, and 25-30 days following the second vaccine dose.

All healthy control subjects generated both anti-spike and anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD) antibodies following the first dose of mRNA vaccine, and the level of antibody increased further after the second dose. However, in patients with MS, the antibody response was far more varied. By 30 days after the second vaccine dose, 85% of participants developed anti-spike antibodies, and 50% mounted anti-RBD responses. For those subjects who did have detectable antibodies, the magnitude of response was generally lower, and the response was delayed compared to the control group.

The timing of a patient’s last aCD20 infusion – typically administered every six months – played a significant role in the immune response mounted. Patients with MS with higher percentages of circulating B cells prior to the vaccine had more robust antibody responses to the vaccine.

“This data not only reveal that patients undergoing anti-CD20 infusions are still able to mount important COVID-19 vaccine responses which are likely to protect from severe illness, but also informs our clinical practices in how we advise patients with MS and other autoimmune disorders on such therapies,” said another of the paper’s senior authors Amit Bar-Or, MD, FRCPC director of the Center for Neuroinflammation and Experimental Therapeutics and chief of the Division of MS and Related Disorders. “For example, knowing that responses are weakest immediately following an anti-CD20 infusion, we can now advise patients to wait a number of months after their therapy to get a COVID-19 vaccine.”

Researchers found that patients who had undergone aCD20 treatments had subpopulations of T cells that responded similarly to vaccination as healthy control subjects. Patients who underwent aCD20 therapy generated robust CD4 and CD8 T cell responses to the COVID-19 vaccination. Further, the CD8 T cell response was especially robust among the subgroup of patients with MS who didn’t generate RBD antibodies. This observation reveals that even without circulating B cells, the COVID-19 vaccine effectively primed patients’ immune response to the virus.

“Often when determining if a patient mounted a proper response to an mRNA vaccine, we test for the presence of antibodies, but this method neglects an entire arm of a person’s immune response,” said one of the lead authors Sokratis A. Apostolidis, MD, a fellow in the Department of Rheumatology. “Measuring both antibodies and T-cell response gives us a more complete picture of a patient’s immune response, and reveals that patients who can’t generate antibodies as well as a healthy person are actually still protected by the COVID-19 vaccine.”

The researchers do note that due to the limited antibody responses mounted by patients receiving aCD20 treatments, they might not be able to neutralize the virus as quickly before it infects other cells, which could result in them being contagious carriers of the virus for a longer period of time.

This work was supported by grants from the NIH (AI105343, AI082630, AI108545, AI155577, AI149680, AI152236, P30-AI0450080, R01 AI118694, UC4 DK112217, T32 AR076951-01, T32 CA009140, U19AI082630, UM1 AI144288, NMSS SI-2011-37160). This work was also supported by NIH contract (Nr. 75N9301900065).

Funding was also provided by the Allen Institute for Immunology, Chen Family Research Fund, the National Multiple Sclerosis Society-American Brain Foundation Clinician Scientist Award, the Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, the Penn Center for Research on Coronavirus and Other Emerging Pathogens, the University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine COVID Fund, the University of Pennsylvania Institute for Immunology Glick COVID-19 research award, the University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine 21st Century Scholar Fund, a philanthropic gift from Jeffrey Lurie, Joel Embiid, Josh Harris, and David Blitzer, the Penn Center for Neuroinflammation and Experimental Therapeutics and the Melissa and Paul Anderson Fund.

###

Penn Medicine is one of the world’s leading academic medical centers, dedicated to the related missions of medical education, biomedical research, and excellence in patient care. Penn Medicine consists of the Raymond and Ruth Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania (founded in 1765 as the nation’s first medical school) and the University of Pennsylvania Health System, which together form a $8.9 billion enterprise.

The Perelman School of Medicine has been ranked among the top medical schools in the United States for more than 20 years, according to U.S. News & World Report's survey of research-oriented medical schools. The School is consistently among the nation's top recipients of funding from the National Institutes of Health, with $496 million awarded in the 2020 fiscal year.

The University of Pennsylvania Health System’s patient care facilities include: the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania and Penn Presbyterian Medical Center—which are recognized as one of the nation’s top “Honor Roll” hospitals by U.S. News & World Report—Chester County Hospital; Lancaster General Health; Penn Medicine Princeton Health; and Pennsylvania Hospital, the nation’s first hospital, founded in 1751. Additional facilities and enterprises include Good Shepherd Penn Partners, Penn Medicine at Home, Lancaster Behavioral Health Hospital, and Princeton House Behavioral Health, among others.

Penn Medicine is powered by a talented and dedicated workforce of more than 44,000 people. The organization also has alliances with top community health systems across both Southeastern Pennsylvania and Southern New Jersey, creating more options for patients no matter where they live.

Penn Medicine is committed to improving lives and health through a variety of community-based programs and activities. In fiscal year 2020, Penn Medicine provided more than $563 million to benefit our community.