News Release

The secret behind pedestrian crossings – and why some spiral into chaos

Neat lanes are the norm at road crossings – until people start veering off at critical angles, then chaos ensues.

Peer-Reviewed Publication

University of Bath

Crowd flow – from orderly to chaotic

image: 

In experimental work, the researchers recorded the movements of pedestrians using an overhead camera.

view more 

Credit: Karol Bacik, MIT

UNDER EMBARGO UNTIL MONDAY, MARCH 24, 2025 (3:00 PM U.S. Eastern time)

Pedestrian crossings generally showcase the best in pedestrian behaviour, with people naturally forming orderly lanes as they cross the road, smoothly passing those coming from the opposite direction without any bumps or scrapes. Sometimes, however, the flow gets chaotic, with individuals weaving through the crowd on their own haphazard paths to the other side.

Now, an international team of mathematicians, co-led by Professor Tim Rogers at the University of Bath in the UK and Dr Karol Bacik at MIT in the US, has made an important breakthrough in their understanding of what causes human flows to disintegrate into tangles. This discovery has the potential to help planners design road crossings and other pedestrian spaces that minimise chaos and enhance safety and efficiency.

In a paper appearing today in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the team pinned down the precise point at which crowds of pedestrians crossing a road collapse from order to disorder. The researchers found that for order to be maintained, the spread of different directions people walk in must be kept below a critical angle of 13 degrees.

When it comes to pedestrian crossings, this could be achieved by limiting the width of a crossing or considering where a crossing is placed, so pedestrians are less tempted to veer off track towards nearby destinations. Professor Rogers said: “In this study, we set out to discover why some pedestrian crowds can spontaneously organise into neat flowing lanes, while others remain chaotic and disordered. Our new theory gives us a way to predict what kind of spaces encourage efficient use, and what are the conditions for order to break down.”

From white board to road crossing

The researchers made their discovery through both mathematical and experimental work. They considered a common scenario in which pedestrians navigate a busy pedestrian crossing. They analysed the scenario through mathematical simulations, considering the many angles at which individuals may cross and the dodging manoeuvres they may make as they attempt to reach their destinations while avoiding bumping into other pedestrians along the way.

The team also carried out controlled crowd experiments and studied how real participants walked through a crowd to reach certain locations.

Professor Rogers, an expert in the mathematics of collective behaviour, and Dr Bacik have been investigating the behaviour the complex fluid-like behaviour of pedestrian crowds for the past four years. In 2023, they explored ‘lane formation’, a phenomenon by which particles, grain and people have been observed to spontaneously form lanes, moving in single file when forced to cross a region from two opposite directions. In that work, the team identified the mechanism by which such lanes form.

Essentially, the researchers found that as soon as something in a crowd starts to look like a lane, individuals around that fledgling lane either join up, or are forced to either side of it, walking parallel to the original lane, which others can follow. In this way, a crowd can spontaneously organise into regular, structured lanes.

Lane change

For their new study, the team set out to identify a key transition in crowd flow: When do pedestrians switch from orderly, lane-like traffic, to a disorganised, messy flow? They first probed the question mathematically, with an equation that is typically used to describe fluid flow, in terms of the average motion of many individual molecules.

Based on their calculations, the researchers found that pedestrians are more likely to form lanes when pedestrians from opposite directions walk relatively straight across a road. This order largely holds until people start veering across at more extreme angles, of 13 degrees or higher. Then, the equation predicts that the pedestrian flow is likely to be disordered, with few to no lanes forming.

Curious to see whether the maths bore out in reality, the researchers carried out experiments in a gymnasium, where they recorded the movements of pedestrians using an overhead camera. In these experiments, the team assigned volunteers various start and end positions along opposite sides of a simulated pedestrian crossing and tasked them to walk across the crossing to their target location without bumping into anyone. The experiment was repeated many times, on each occasion with volunteers assuming a different start and end position. This way, the researchers were able to gather visual data of multiple crowd flows, with pedestrians taking many different crossing angles.

These experiments showed that the transition from ordered to disordered flow occurred close to the value predicted by the theory. That is, when people tended to veer more than a critical angle from straight ahead, the pedestrian flow tipped into disorder, with little lane formation. What’s more, the researchers found that the more disorder there is in a crowd, the slower it moves.

Next, the team would like to test their predictions on real-world crowds, such as people navigating busy pedestrian thoroughfares in busy cities.

Dr Bacik said: “"Our work could provide some simple guidelines for anyone designing a public space, if the aim is to have safe and efficient pedestrian flow. So far, we’ve focused on the simplest scenarios where people cross the road, but if we take into account the specifics of a given city, our model can make tailored predictions of how people will behave."

The study’s authors also include Grzegorz Sobota and Bogdan Bacik of the Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Poland.


Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.