News Release

Won’t you be mine? Neighborly networking may motivate local climate action

Researchers surveyed climate action catalysts, barriers in nine European neighborhoods

Peer-Reviewed Publication

PLOS

Individual motivation to act against climate change outweighs the impact of hyperlocal collective intentions, though both approaches are worth strengthening, according to a survey of nine European neighborhoods published Nov. 20, 2024 in the open-access journal PLOS Climate by Christian A. Klöckner from the Norwegian University of Science and Technology and colleagues.

Western society contests the individual versus collective responsibility to combat climate change. But do people feel more motivated to act individually (e.g., making waste-free purchasing choices) or in tandem with others (e.g., protesting or completing workplace waste reduction challenges)? Klöckner and his colleagues investigated why citizens take pro-climate action in a hyperlocal, understudied environment: the neighborhood.

They surveyed 1,084 residents of nine European neighborhoods during the summers of 2022 and 2023: three neighborhoods in Austria and two each in Italy, Norway and Finland. Respondents described their neighborhoods’ cultural and social environments and what motivates their individual and collective pro-climate actions. Participants self-reported these climate-conscious habits across four categories: diet (e.g., eating vegan), travel (e.g., carsharing), protest (e.g., signing a petition) and general behaviors (e.g., buying items secondhand).

Results indicated that individual, collective, cultural and socio-structural factors were all to some degree associated with respondents’ self-reported responses to climate change. Socially, men reported weaker individual intentions to act and weaker pro-climate attitudes (but not weaker climate action) than women. Larger households generally reported more pro-climate behaviors, and those with children younger than 14 years old reported less. People with university degrees reported more pro-climate behaviors and a stronger intent to act individually. Full-time workers reported a weaker intent to act collectively.

Both individual and collective intentions to fight climate change were associated with increased climate action behaviors. Generally, perceived individual efficacy motivated participants’ intention to act individually, while the relationships among neighbors — also known as a neighborhood’s social capital — motivated collective intent to act. The researchers suggest physically reconfiguring neighborhoods to strengthen local networks and galvanize collective action.

Because this study’s participants are highly localized, the researchers caution against generalizing their results and encourage investigating additional European and non-European neighborhoods.

The authors summarize: "Climate mitigation is a collective task; therefore we analysed the role of neighbourhoods in motivating climate action. We found that in neighbourhoods with high social capital, climate action is easier to engage in."

#####

In your coverage please use this URL to provide access to the freely available article in PLOS Climate: https://journals.plos.org/climate/article?id=10.1371/journal.pclm.0000424

Citation: Klöckner CA, Brenner-Fliesser M, Carrus G, De Gregorio E, Erica L, Luketina R, et al. (2024) Climate actions on the neighbourhood level—Individual, collective, cultural, and socio-structural factors. PLOS Clim 3(11): e0000424. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000424

Author Countries: Austria, Finland, Italy, Norway

Funding: This study has been conducted in the JPI Climate project “CLEAN Cultures”, which is funded in JPI Climate joint transnational call SOLSTICE (Enabling Societal Transformation in the Face of Climate Change). Project numbers: Norwegian Research Council 321315, funding achieved by CAK; Academy of Finland (funding decision number 338128, funding achieved by LSO); Austrian Research Promotion Agency 879545, funding achieved by MBF; funding by the Italian Ministry of Education, University, and Research, funding acquired by GC. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.