New study reveals a global consensus on what democracy means

• Researchers have carried out a new comprehensive assessment on how different people around the world understand the concept of ‘democracy.’

• The results demonstrate that -overwhelmingly- people in diverse countries agree that two factors are the most important for democratic societies: competitive elections and strong protections for civil liberties.
• The findings have been published today (17 October) by the leading journal Science.

Most people in most countries state that they wish to have a democratic government. But the definition of democracy has been contested constantly. Without understanding what people really mean by democracy, the concept is vulnerable to being exploited by dictators and anti-democratic politicians for their own ends. Today, democracy is under pressure within and across societies, even in long-standing democracies such as the United States and India.

A new research study led by the University of Oxford, National University of Singapore, and Emory University has now shed light on the question ‘How do people around the world define democracy?’ The study surveyed over 6000 people from the United States, Italy, Egypt, India, Thailand, and Japan- countries with highly different political regimes, democratic histories, geographic regions, levels of development, and cultural backgrounds. The study explored how people prioritize nine different attributes in their understanding of what makes a country democratic, using examples of hypothetical countries.

Key findings:

• Overwhelmingly, the two most important factors identified by participants were competitive elections and strong protections for civil liberties. The relevance of these was consistent regardless of people’s age, gender, education, minority status, or political ideology.

• Participants were significantly more likely to view countries that select their leaders through free and fair elections as more democratic than countries without elections.
• Participants were also significantly more likely to view countries with strong protections for civil liberties as more democratic compared with countries without such protections.
• After elections and liberties, the two most important attributes were gender equality, then economic equality. Countries in which men and women have equal rights are more likely to be seen as democratic than countries with highly unequal gender rights. Relative equality between the rich and poor (compared with high inequality) also increased the likelihood that a country was seen as more democratic.
• Institutional checks and balances were also seen to be important for democracy, although not as significantly as elections or civil liberties.  Countries where leaders must respect the legislature and courts’ authority in decision making were more likely to be perceived as more democratic compared with countries in which the leader frequently bypasses the legislative and judicial branches when making decisions.
• Finally, participants were generally more likely to see countries in which they can directly vote on policies as more democratic, but this ‘direct democracy’ was relatively unimportant compared to other factors.

In contrast the researchers found little evidence of an ‘authoritarian’ redefinition of democracy taking root anywhere. Even within authoritarian countries such as Egypt or Thailand, democracy was still perceived as being rooted in elections and liberties.

Co-author Associate Professor Scott Williamson (Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Oxford) said: “We found that people across six very different countries consistently emphasize competitive elections and civil liberties as key determinants of what makes a country democratic. This shared understanding of democracy’s most important elements makes it more likely that people can identify undemocratic behaviour and push back against undemocratic political leaders.”

Co-author Professor Jonathan A. Chu (Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore) added: "Our research speaks to the international competition over the place and meaning of democracy worldwide, as countries like China advance definitions of democracy that challenge traditional understandings that focus on free and fair elections and individual liberties."

Co-author PhD candidate Eddy S. F. Yeung (Department of Political Science, Emory University) said: “The concept of democracy is increasingly muddled in global conversations, especially in an era of democratic backsliding. Our collaborative effort provides systematic evidence that conventional elements of democracy still play an important role in shaping ordinary citizens’ understandings of democracy."

Notes for editors:

For interviews and media requests, contact Associate Professor Scott Williamson: scott.williamson@politics.ox.ac.uk

The paper ‘People consistently view elections and civil liberties as key components of democracy’ will be published in Science at 19:00 BST / 14:00 ET Thursday, 17 October 2024, DOI: 10.1126/science.adp1274 Advance copies of the paper may be obtained from the Science press package, SciPak, at https://www.eurekalert.org/press/scipak/ or by contacting scipak@aaas.org.

About the Department of Politics and International Relations (DPIR), University of Oxford

DPIR is one of the largest departments working in Politics and International Relations in the world, and is active in both undergraduate and graduate teaching. With around 90 academic staff, it is world class in international and national research and teaching; in September 2024, The Guardian UK ranked us the Number One University in the UK for Politics. We are home to major research projects, a vibrant community of academic visitors, and a strong group of post-doctoral researchers, supported by highly competitive research fellowships, working across a broad range of disciplinary fields.

About the University of Oxford

Oxford University has been placed number 1 in the Times Higher Education World University Rankings for the ninth year running, and ​number 3 in the QS World Rankings 2024. At the heart of this success are the twin-pillars of our ground-breaking research and innovation and our distinctive educational offer.

Oxford is world-famous for research and teaching excellence and home to some of the most talented people from across the globe. Our work helps the lives of millions, solving real-world problems through a huge network of partnerships and collaborations. The breadth and interdisciplinary nature of our research alongside our personalised approach to teaching sparks imaginative and inventive insights and solutions.

Through its research commercialisation arm, Oxford University Innovation, Oxford is the highest university patent filer in the UK and is ranked first in the UK for university spinouts, having created more than 300 new companies since 1988. Over a third of these companies have been created in the past five years. The university is a catalyst for prosperity in Oxfordshire and the United Kingdom, contributing £15.7 billion to the UK economy in 2018/19, and supports more than 28,000 full time jobs.