News Release

Intimate partner violence: Preserving patient privacy saves lives

Electronic health record-based screening for intimate partner violence at the Medical University of South Carolina prioritizes confidentiality.

Peer-Reviewed Publication

Medical University of South Carolina

Dr. Vanessa Diaz of the Medical University of South Carolina (right)

image: 

Family medicine physician Dr. Vanessa Diaz (right) of the Medical University of South Carolina speaking to a member of the care team. Dr. Diaz was part of the team that implemented the electronic health record-based intimate partner violence screening tool in primary care centers across South Carolina.

view more 

Credit: Medical University of South Carolina. Photograph by Zheng Chia.

Historically, South Carolina has had some of the highest rates of intimate partner violence, or IPV, in the U.S. IPV encompasses any physical or sexual violence, stalking and psychological aggression by a current or previous partner or spouse.

“There is an epidemic of intimate partner violence in South Carolina,” said Leslie A. Lenert, M.D., associate provost of Data Science and Informatics and director of the Biomedical Informatics Center at the Medical University of South Carolina.

To address that epidemic, Lenert partnered with clinical psychologist Alyssa A. Rheingold, Ph.D., family physician Vanessa Diaz, M.D., and health services researcher Kit N. Simpson, DrPH, to develop electronic health record (EHR)-based screening for IPV, with funding from the Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research. They report in JAMA Network Open that this EHR-based screening, which prioritized confidentiality, was 10 times more effective than traditional oral screening.

Screening for IPV in primary care is recommended by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, as it can help to identify those at risk. However, IPV screening is often underused due to hectic clinical schedules and, when used, performed orally. These oral screenings lack privacy, which can cause victims to feel uncomfortable reporting.

Improved screening is urgently needed because IPV can have long-lasting effects on victims and their families.

“Victims in violent relationships are at risk for long-term psychological difficulties, like post-traumatic stress disorder, and children witnessing domestic violence also face challenges,” explained Rheingold, professor in MUSC’s Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.

Though both men and women can be subjected to IPV, there is a higher prevalence among women, and women are more likely to be severely injured or killed. For this reason, the team worked with advisory boards to adapt a screener for physical and sexual violence and electronically administered it exclusively to women.

“We consulted with an advisory board of national experts, as well as an advisory board of victims and survivors of intimate partner violence, to gather their input on what screening tools would be the most successful,” said Rheingold.

After confirming the best approach, they launched their screener in primary care centers across South Carolina.

As a family physician, Diaz, chief of MUSC’s Primary Care Integrated Center of Clinical Excellence, had first-hand experience with the necessity and difficulty of incorporating IPV screening.

“It was important to give the patients a safe space through technology, where they felt comfortable answering these very personal and emotional questions,” she said. “At the same time, the screening needed to be streamlined into existing workflows because, unfortunately, providers have a lot of competing demands.”

Instead of having primary care staff or providers orally ask patients about IPV, the patients were handed a computer with a confidential questionnaire without their partners present. This lessened the chance of patients feeling judged by staff members or intimidated by their partners. Visit notes about IPV and physician-patient communications were also stored in a confidential area of the EHR, which the patient and provider could access but not the spouse or partner.

Additionally, providers were given best practices for discussing IPV with patients as well as referral resources where women could seek further help.

“The training and decision support given to providers helped us to address any needs the patient had,” explained Diaz.

In the end, the MUSC team’s EHR-based screening proved to be 10 times more effective than traditional oral screening.

Not only did this screening increase the identification of women enduring IPV, but it also helped to normalize IPV screening.

“I was pleasantly surprised that our staff and patients were thankful that we were asking about IPV, even if it didn’t apply to them, because they know it’s a big problem and that screening is an important first step toward getting people the help they need,” said Diaz.

To help women to take that first step, this team is working toward bridging the gap in patient reporting.

“We aim to make the doctor’s office a safe place where women can discuss IPV with their provider and move forward with the difficult task of escaping an abusive relationship,” said Lenert.

The researchers realize that their EHR-based screening is not a quick fix for IPV. They emphasize the importance of empowering victims to seek help.

“We recognize that most situations are complex, and we want people experiencing IP

V to know that there is support available to help them to feel safe and get to a place of safety,” stressed Rheingold.

The 24/7 National Domestic Violence Hotline can be reached at 1-800-799-7233.

###

About MUSC

Founded in 1824 in Charleston, MUSC is the state’s only comprehensive academic health system, with a unique mission to preserve and optimize human life in South Carolina through education, research and patient care. Each year, MUSC educates more than 3,200 students in six colleges – Dental Medicine, Graduate Studies, Health Professions, Medicine, Nursing and Pharmacy – and trains more than 900 residents and fellows in its health system. MUSC brought in more than $358.9 million in research funds in fiscal year 2024, leading the state overall in research funding. MUSC also leads the state in federal and National Institutes of Health funding. For information on academic programs, visit musc.edu.

As the health care system of the Medical University of South Carolina, MUSC Health is dedicated to delivering the highest-quality and safest patient care while educating and training generations of outstanding health care providers and leaders to serve the people of South Carolina and beyond. Patient care is provided at 16 hospitals (includes owned or governing interest), with approximately 2,700 beds and five additional hospital locations in development, more than 350 telehealth sites and nearly 750 care locations situated in all regions of South Carolina. In 2024, for the 10th consecutive year, U.S. News & World Report named MUSC Health University Medical Center in Charleston the No. 1 hospital in South Carolina. To learn more about clinical patient services, visit muschealth.org.

MUSC has a total enterprise annual operating budget of approximately $7.1 billion. The 31,000 MUSC family members include world-class faculty, physicians, specialty providers, scientists, students, contract employees, affiliates and care team members who deliver groundbreaking education, research and patient care.


Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.