Virologic rebound observed in 20% of patients treated with nirmatrelvir-ritonavir

Embargoed for release until 5:00 p.m. ET on Monday 13 November 2023 
Annals of Internal Medicine Tip Sheet 
@Annalsofim 
Below please find summaries of new articles that will be published in the next issue of Annals of Internal Medicine. The summaries are not intended to substitute for the full articles as a source of information. This information is under strict embargo and by taking it into possession, media representatives are committing to the terms of the embargo not only on their own behalf, but also on behalf of the organization they represent. 
----------------------------------------------  

Virologic rebound observed in 20% of patients treated with nirmatrelvir-ritonavir  

Abstract: https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M23-1756  

Editorial: https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M23-2887  
URL goes live when the embargo lifts  
An observational study of patients being treated for acute COVID-19 in a multicenter health care system observed virologic rebound in about 20 percent of patients treated with nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (N-R) versus about 2 percent of those who did not receive treatment. The findings are published in Annals of Internal Medicine. 

N-R is an oral antiviral widely used in the United Sates to reduce the incidence of hospitalization and death among individuals with mild to moderate COVID-19. Soon after its adoption into clinical care, a clinical and virologic rebound phenomenon was reported, but data are conflicting about how common it is. 

Researchers from Massachusetts General Hospital and Brigham and Women’s Hospital studied 127 patients with acute COVID-19 to compare the frequency of virologic rebound in patients with (n=72) and without (n=55) N-R treatment. The study outcome was viral rebound within 3 weeks of an initial positive test, defined as either a positive SARS-CoV-2 viral culture following a prior negative culture or sustained elevated viral load after a prior decline. With frequent monitoring by both PCR and viral culture during the acute stages of COVID-19, the data showed that virologic rebound with replication-competent prolonged viral shedding occurred in approximately 1 in 5 individuals taking N-R. Only 1 untreated patient experienced virologic rebound. People who rebounded shedded live virus for a median of 14 days versus less than 5 dyas in those who did not. A regression model showed a trend towards higher rates of virologic rebound with earlier N-R initiation after the date of diagnosis and with earlier N-R initiation after the onset of symptoms. The researchers noted that compared with untreated individuals, those taking N-R were older, had received more COVID-19 vaccinations, and were more often immunosuppressed. 

According to the study authors, these findings should be factored into consideration when weighing the benefits and risks of N-R treatment in patients at low risk for severe disease. Still, for patients at moderate to high-risk for severe COVID-19, the clinical benefits associated with N-R use are well established.  

Media contacts: For an embargoed PDF or to speak to editorial author, Christina Wee, MD, MPH, please contact Angela Collom at acollom@acponline.org. To speak with the corresponding author, Mark J. Siedner, MD, MPH, please contact Haley Bridger at hbridger@mgb.org.