Contours that kill: Geometry influences prey capture in carnivorous pitcher plants

Researchers at the University of Oxford’s Botanic Garden and the Mathematical Institute have shown that the shape, size, and geometry of carnivorous pitcher plants determines the type of prey they trap. The results have been published today in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS).

Pitcher plants (genus Nepenthes) are a type of carnivorous plant found in the tropics, especially in Southeast Asia. Their name refers to the hollow, cup-like structures they produce to capture animal prey (typically insects). Pitcher plants come in an enormous variety of shapes and sizes from tubes to goblets, some even with spine-like ‘teeth’ – but why they differ so markedly is a mystery.

‘I first encountered these extraordinary plants in the wild in Southeast Asia nearly twenty years ago.’ recalls Dr Chris Thorogood, botanist and Deputy Director of Oxford Botanic Garden. ‘I remember wondering: how and why do they vary so much? To have helped solve this mystery is truly exciting.’

The mechanism by which pitcher plants capture prey is well known: each pitcher has a slippery rim at the top, called a peristome, covered in ridges that collect a film of water. This causes the prey to skid and fall into a pool of digestive juices at the bottom of the pitcher, similar to a car aquaplaning on water. But although this process is common to all pitcher plants, the shape of the rim ranges from simple cylinders, to highly ornate, fluted, or toothed structures. The more lavish the rim, the greater the cost to produce it: so why don’t all pitcher plants just produce a simple structure?

To address this question, the team applied mathematical models to pitcher plants grown at the Botanic Garden, to see what effect the rim’s shape has on prey capture. Shapes were classified into four groups that exist in nature and could be easily compared using mathematical reconstructions. Hypothetical capture efficiencies were measured for each shape using a ‘point mass’ – the equivalent of an insect sliding into the trap. The energetic cost of producing the rim was then calculated by examining the relative area and steepness of the different structures.

Derek Moulton, Professor of Applied Mathematics at the University of Oxford’s Mathematical Institute, explained: ‘Mathematical reconstructions enable us to explore the trade-offs that exist in these plants in nature. Large, flared rims are costly for a plant to produce. By simulating both realistic peristomes and extreme versions – geometries that don’t exist in nature – we were able to show that in an optimal structure, the cost of production might be offset by the extra prey that can be caught.’

‘A similar situation exists regarding trap size,’ added Dr Hadrien Oliveri, Postdoctoral Researcher at the University of Oxford’s Mathematical Institute. ‘We might expect the size of the rim to correlate with the prey most commonly available in a given habitat – be that ants or beetles, for example.’

To investigate the impact of the trap size, the team developed a mathematical model to link the 3D geometries of pitcher plant rims with the physical mechanics of prey capture. The model incorporated geometrical features of the rims - including width, degree of flaring, and orientation – and the stability and sliding direction of prey placed at various points.

The results suggested that variations in peristome geometries had a profound effect on what the plant could catch. For example, the geometry of highly flared peristomes appeared to be particularly suited to capturing walking insects such as ants.

Pitcher plants in nature are found in nitrogen-poor environments – such as mountain slopes, swamps and tropical forests. This means their ability to capture nitrogen from trapped insects gives them an advantage over non-carnivorous plants. Each of these habitats has a unique combination of potential prey, raising the possibility that pitcher plants evolved a variety of traps to tap into the various types of available insects in a given place.

‘Just as birds’ beaks are shaped differently to feed on nuts, seeds, or insects and so on,’ explained Dr Thorogood, ‘these pitcher plants are well-adapted to the different forms of prey that exist in their environments.’

But despite the popular appeal of these ‘green predators’, studying them in the wild can be difficult. Consequently, mathematical approaches can be a powerful way to shed light on these botanical curiosities.

‘Observing these plants in their natural environments is of course the best way to understand them. But many of these plants grow in remote, inhospitable places, so studying them in nature can be challenging’ said Dr Thorogood.

‘Working together is a powerful way for mathematicians and biologists to understand how and why such extraordinary organisms evolved, and to come up with new hypotheses,’ said Alain Goriely, Professor of Mathematical Modelling at the Mathematical Institute. ‘Mathematical modelling enables us to test them.’

The team plans to continue their work on pitcher plants, and other plants grown at the Botanic Garden – a living library for scientists to explore.

Notes for editors:

For media enquiries and interview requests contact Dr Caroline Wood: caroline.wood@admin.ox.ac.uk

Images of pitcher plants for use in articles can be accessed here: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/12ERYe5g8DjEUNUV4euIAscJsAAkObWIo?usp=sharing

A YouTube video summary of the results can be found here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBIJwVOsPok 

The study ‘Mechanics reveals the role of peristome geometry in prey capture in carnivorous pitcher plants (Nepenthes)’ has been published in PNAS: https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2306268120

About the Oxford Botanic Garden and Arboretum

Oxford Botanic Garden is the UK’s oldest botanic garden, founded in 1621. The Garden was first established as a physic garden for the cultivation of medicinal plants, and still occupies a unique position in terms of its history and academic location to this day. It was the birthplace of botanical science in the UK and has been a centre for plant research since the 1600s.

Oxford Botanic Garden’s mission is to share the scientific wonder of plants and the importance of plants with the world. It holds a collection of about 5,000 different types of plant, together with its sister site, Harcourt Arboretum. Some of these species exist nowhere else and are of international conservation importance.

About the University of Oxford

Oxford University has been placed number 1 in the Times Higher Education World University Rankings for the seventh year running, and number 2 in the QS World Rankings 2022. At the heart of this success are the twin-pillars of our ground-breaking research and innovation and our distinctive educational offer.

Oxford is world-famous for research and teaching excellence and home to some of the most talented people from across the globe. Our work helps the lives of millions, solving real-world problems through a huge network of partnerships and collaborations. The breadth and interdisciplinary nature of our research alongside our personalised approach to teaching sparks imaginative and inventive insights and solutions.

Through its research commercialisation arm, Oxford University Innovation, Oxford is the highest university patent filer in the UK and is ranked first in the UK for university spinouts, having created more than 200 new companies since 1988. Over a third of these companies have been created in the past three years. The university is a catalyst for prosperity in Oxfordshire and the United Kingdom, contributing £15.7 billion to the UK economy in 2018/19, and supports more than 28,000 full time jobs.

---

---