News Release

Initial steps to compile a healthy human gut microbiome reference database underway

Peer-Reviewed Publication

PLOS

Initial Steps to Compile a Healthy Human Gut Microbiome Reference Database Underway with GutFeelingK

image: Stacked bar plot of phylogenetic composition of all microbiome taxa in this study collapsed at the phyla level in fecal samples. Green bars represent Firmicutes and the blue represent Bacteroidetes, the two most abundant bacterial families. For aesthetic purposes the samples (n = 98, bottom) were sorted according to their composition of Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes to demonstrate how the baseline gut microbiome results from this study could be used in conjunction with results from past studies. view more 

Credit: King et al, 2019

An initial baseline healthy gut microbiome database and abundance profile is described in a study published September 11, 2019 in the open-access journal PLOS ONE by Charles Hadley King from George Washington University Medical Center, USA, and colleagues.

Though research interest in the human gut microbiome's importance to overall health continues to grow, there's currently no comprehensive gut microbiome reference list available to researchers and patients. In this study, King and colleagues begin to catalog the organismal makeup of healthy human gut microbiomes, and developed a prototype reporting template for clinicians to relay results to patients.

To compile their database, the authors genetically sequenced 48 fecal samples from sixteen healthy participants recruited from George Washington University campus in Washington, D.C., in addition to using 50 fecal metagenomic samples downloaded from the Human Microbiome Project from individuals screened as "healthy".

After parsing all samples' genomic and metagenomic sequences using a novel software-based workflow, King and colleagues compiled an initial database of confirmed microbes and their relative abundance across all samples, the GutFeelingKB, using NCBI's comprehensive and publicly available genetic information to provide metadata on the organisms described.

The GutFeelingKB describes 157 organisms (155 bacterial and two archaeal organisms) across 60 distinct genera. The largest phylum of bacteria represented was Firmicutes (40 percent of all organisms on the list), which in turn was made up of 20 percent Clostridia, 19 percent Bacterioidia, 17 percent Bifidobacteriales, 14 percent Enterobacterales, and 14 percent Lactobacillales bacteria--classes of bacteria also found in yogurt and other probiotic foods. The authors also note that 84 organisms were common to all of the samples, potentially indicating that these may be core species for the human gut.

This study only recruited sixteen participants, a small sample. But while further studies might continue to identify additional organisms present in healthy guts from around the world, GutFeelingKB is an important first step. The database could act as a starting point for comparative analysis of samples and the development of future patient microbiome treatments.

The authors add: "Our goal is to map the healthy gut microbiome so that we and other researchers can use our data to develop disease specific prediction models."

###

Citation: King CH, Desai H, Sylvetsky AC, LoTempio J, Ayanyan S, Carrie J, et al. (2019) Baseline human gut microbiota profile in healthy people and standard reporting template. PLoS ONE 14(9): e0206484. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206484

Funding: This project was supported in part by funds from National Science Foundation (NSF) (award number: 1546491 to RM), the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (award number UL1TR000075 to KAC, HM, RM), and the McCormick Genomic and Proteomic Center (MGPC) at the George Washington University. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

In your coverage please use this URL to provide access to the freely available article in PLOS ONE: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0206484


Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.