News Release

Substantial increase in body weight since 1960s due to interplay between genes and environment

But findings imply that an increasingly 'obesogenic' environment is the main contributor

Peer-Reviewed Publication

BMJ Group

People with a genetic predisposition to obesity are not only at greater risk of excess weight, their genes interact with an increasingly "obesogenic" environment, resulting in higher body mass index (BMI) in recent decades, finds a study from Norway published by The BMJ today.

But the findings also show that BMI has increased for both genetically predisposed and non-predisposed people since the 1960s, implying that the environment remains the main contributor to the obesity epidemic.

Obesity has almost tripled worldwide since 1975, but the origins of the epidemic are still unclear. Previous studies have suggested an interplay between genes and the environment, but are limited by a narrow age span, short follow-up, and self-reported weight.

How the effect of genetic predisposition on obesity differs as environments are becoming more obesogenic is also unknown.

So researchers in Norway set out to study changes in body mass index (BMI) over five decades, and to assess the effect of the environment on BMI according to genetic predisposition.

Their findings are based on data from 118,959 people aged 13-80 years in the Nord - Trøndelag Health Study who had repeated height and weight measurements recorded between 1963 and 2008. Of these, 67,305 were included in analyses of the association between genetic predisposition and BMI.

After taking account of potentially influential factors, the data show a noticeable increase in BMI in Norway starting between the mid-1980s and mid-1990s. What's more, compared with older birth cohorts, those born after 1970 had a substantially higher BMI already in young adulthood.

When participants were divided into five equal groups (the top fifth being the most genetically susceptible to higher BMI and the bottom fifth being the least), BMI differed substantially between the highest and lowest fifths for all ages at each decade, and the difference increased gradually from the 1960s to the 2000s.

For example, for 35 year old men, the most genetically predisposed had 1.20 kg/m2 higher BMI than those who were least genetically predisposed in the 1960s, compared with 2.09 kg/m2 in the 2000s. For women of the same age, the corresponding differences in BMI were 1.77 kg/m2 and 2.58 kg/m2.

"Hence, the increased difference in BMI of 0.89 kg/m2 and 0.81 kg/m2 for men and women, respectively, in the 2000s, could be attributed to the gene-obesogenic environment interaction," say the researchers.

This is an observational study so can't establish cause. However, the results were largely unchanged after several additional analyses, suggesting that the findings withstand scrutiny.

The researchers therefore conclude that in the Norwegian population, BMI increased substantially from the 1960s to 2000s for both men and women, and the increase was more evident in people with a genetic predisposition to higher BMI.

"Our study suggests that genetic predisposition interacts with the obesogenic environment and this has resulted in higher BMI in recent decades," they write. And they call for population-wide strategies to reduce overall BMI.

A greater understanding of the variation between people is key, say US researchers in a linked editorial.

For instance, BMI seems to vary across population groups and within a given population over time - and most of this variation remains unexplained. As such, they suggest that an exclusive focus on population-wide preventive strategies "is unlikely to make a noticeable difference in reversing the obesity epidemic."

Future research, "should aim to identify more clearly the sources of within population variation to inform better strategies for improving the health of both populations and individuals," they write. "Further, it is necessary to consider both mean BMI and the variation in BMI when deciding where best to target these strategies."

###

Peer-reviewed? Yes (research); No (linked editorial)

Type of evidence: Observational; Opinion

Subjects: People


Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.