image: Dr Veronica Grieneisen and Dr Stan Maree demonstrate the novel technique LOCO-EFA. view more
Credit: Phil Robinson - John Innes Centre
It's one of the major challenges of biology: how to accurately quantify the mass of swarming, shifting shapes that make up the matter of life.
Such shapes carry vital clues about stages of development, differences in growth conditions and indicate molecular changes that might signify disease....if only they can be captured and quantified.
Now the labs of Dr Veronica Grieneisen and Dr Stan Marée at the John Innes Centre have devised an ingenious method of measuring those elusive life forms thanks to some serious mathematical modelling and a little musical inspiration.
The novel technique - called LOCO-EFA - features today on the front page of the Company of Biologists journal Development. It is already being enthusiastically taken up by international teams of researchers who intend to use it to quantify cell and leaf shape and even paleontologists investigating the evolution of organism shape.
In musical terms, says Dr Veronica Grieneisen, whose fascination with music helped shape the study, the team has found a way of analysing complex shapes that delivers not only the basic sound but its subtlety, depth and harmonic range.
"We've shown that any simple or complex cell shape can be captured like music by its pitch, amplitude and timbre," she explains.
"The end-result is that we can now mathematically capture directly recognisable biological features from any kind of two-dimensional shape, allowing us to compare and contrast shapes in a fair and biologically relevant way."
The new tool emerged from the PhD project of Yara Sánchez-Corrales from the Grieneisen Lab on cell polarity: the ability of cells to distribute internal proteins in order to facilitate communication, movement or growth.
The Grieneisen lab uses the reference plant Arabidopsis and computer models to focus on the misshapen misfits called pavement cells that make up the surface of plant leaves.
While most plant cells are brick-like in shape, pavement cells resemble jigsaw puzzle pieces. They can transition from simple shapes to complex ones of 30-40 protrusions as their dynamics are visibly altered by internal protein activity.
"To describe some of these cell phenotypes we were using lab words such as skinny wiggly cells, chubby wavy cells or zig-zagging sausages," says Dr Grieneisen. "This was subjective...we desperately needed to objectively capture in numbers the complexity of a biological shape."
Being able to adequately quantify and compare the shapes of cells or organisms is of ultimate importance for biology, says Dr Grieneisen. This is because the shape of cells, organs and even entire organisms represent the outcome of internal processes - how genes and proteins interact and trigger biophysical manifestations.
Dr Sánchez-Corrales' search for an adequate mathematical representation for cell shape led the group to discover there were inherent errors in quantifying shape properties through a traditional method named the Elliptic Fourier Analysis, named after Joseph Fourier the French mathematician and physicist.
This brought Dr Grieniesen's lab into collaboration with Dr Stan Maree, an expert in pattern formation whose lab at the John Innes Centre specialises in multi-level modelling of morphogenesis.
From this collaboration the teams developed the LOCO-EFA technique which involves decomposing two-dimensional cell shapes - the shapes you can see under a microscope - into a series of ellipses.
These are further broken down and regrouped in a specific manner to uniquely describe shape properties which can be summed up to yield back the shape..The process resembles that of the geometric drawing toy Spirograph which uses circles to draw complex shapes.
Using mathematical procedures, these patterns are condensed into a series of numbers which add up to a characteristic "fingerprint." This captures the distribution of protrusions or lobes that comprise the complex geometry of the cell, leaf or organ under scrutiny.
"We were inspired by a music analogy which guided the mathematics we performed," explained Dr Grieniesen.
"Like the different notes played by instruments, our method is able to retrieve the pitch of a shape - for example its number of protrusions. Continuing the analogy, we can quantify amplitude - how pronounced the shape is. And, finally, we can distinguish timbre: in the same way one can distinguish between a violin and an oboe, our method can distinguish between different species or mutants and wild-types, even when displaying the same absolute number of main protrusions, the same 'pitch'."
The tool will enable better phenotyping of cell shapes and also understanding of how cell shapes change in relation to others, and over time. But the appeal and applications are much wider says Dr Grieneisen.
"Our method will open the door to quantifying 2D shapes in all biology. But also, this is universal: it is a method available to any scientist in the world needing to quantify shape."
###
The study appears today in the paper Morphometrics of complex cell shapes: Lobe Contribution Elliptic Fourier Analysis
The full report: http://dev.biologists.org/content/145/6/dev156778
Background information:
Pictures/Media and captions:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1N3cYAma4teHoyU5ByFAR6cFzTHQEYrmS
Notes for Editors
Contacts
Press Contact: Adrian Galvin - Adrian.Galvin@jic.ac.uk
Tel: 01603 450238 Out of Hours Tel: 07881 255193
About the John Innes Centre
The John Innes Centre is an independent, international centre of excellence in plant science and microbiology.
Our mission is to generate knowledge of plants and microbes through innovative research, to train scientists for the future, to apply our knowledge of nature's diversity to benefit agriculture, the environment, human health, and wellbeing, and engage with policy makers and the public.
To achieve these goals we establish pioneering long-term research objectives in plant and microbial science, with a focus on genetics. These objectives include promoting the translation of research through partnerships to develop improved crops and to make new products from microbes and plants for human health and other applications. We also create new approaches, technologies and resources that enable research advances and help industry to make new products. The knowledge, resources and trained researchers we generate help global societies address important challenges including providing sufficient and affordable food, making new products for human health and industrial applications, and developing sustainable bio-based manufacturing.
This provides a fertile environment for training the next generation of plant and microbial scientists, many of whom go on to careers in industry and academia, around the world.
The John Innes Centre is strategically funded by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC). In 2015-2016 the John Innes Centre received a total of £30.1 million from the BBSRC.
The John Innes Centre is also supported by the John Innes Foundation through provision of research accommodation and long-term support of the Rotation PhD programme.
The John Innes Centre is the winner of the BBSRC's 2013 - 2016 Excellence with Impact award.
For more information about the John Innes Centre visit our website http://www.jic.ac.uk
About the BBSRC
The Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) invests in world-class bioscience research and training on behalf of the UK public. Our aim is to further scientific knowledge, to promote economic growth, wealth and job creation and to improve quality of life in the UK and beyond.
Funded by government, BBSRC invested £469 million in world-class bioscience in 2016-17. We support research and training in universities and strategically funded institutes. BBSRC research and the people we fund are helping society to meet major challenges, including food security, green energy and healthier, longer lives. Our investments underpin important UK economic sectors, such as farming, food, industrial biotechnology and pharmaceuticals.
Journal
Development