In this week's PLoS Medicine, Lawrence Gostin from Georgetown University, Washington DC, and colleagues argue that a global health agreement—such as a Framework Convention on Global Health—is needed and would inform post-Millennium Development Goal (MDG) global health commitments.
The authors discuss their work on the Joint Action and Learning Initiative on National and Global Responsibilities for Health (JALI), a coalition of civil society organizations and academics that seeks to clarify the health services to which everyone is entitled under the human right to health, the national and global responsibilities for securing this right, and global governance structures that can realize these responsibilities and close major health inequities.
The authors say that "mutual benefits to countries in the global South and North would come from a global health agreement that defines national and global health responsibilities, and that the JALI aims to "respond to growing demands for accountability, and to create the political space that could make a global health agreement possible".
Funding: No direct funding was received for this study.
Competing Interests: Thomas Gebauer works for Medico International, a Germany-based nongovernmental organization. No other author declares a competing interest.
Citation: Gostin LO, Friedman EA, Ooms G, Gebauer T, Gupta N, et al. (2011) The Joint Action and Learning Initiative: Towards a Global Agreement on National and Global Responsibilities for Health. PLoS Med 8(5): e1001031. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001031
IN YOUR COVERAGE PLEASE USE THIS URL TO PROVIDE ACCESS TO THE FREELY AVAILABLE PAPER: http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1001031
CONTACT: Prof. Lawrence Gostin
Georgetown University Law Center
600 New Jersey Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C.
20001-2075
+1 202 662 9408
gostin@law.georgetown.edu
Journal
PLoS Medicine