A new anticoagulant drug dabigatran is as effective as warfarin in preventing stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation who have previously had a stroke or transient ischaemic attack, according to an Article published Online First by The Lancet Neurology.
Patients with atrial fibrillation are at a higher risk of stroke or systemic embolism. Last year, the Randomised Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy (RE-LY) trial found that 110 mg dabigatran twice daily was as effective as warfarin in reducing the occurrence of stroke and that 150 mg dabigatran twice daily was better than warfarin in patients who had atrial fibrillation. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recently approved dabigatran 150 mg for the prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation.
3623 (20%) of 18113 patients in the main study had previously had a stroke or transient ischaemic attack, and this factor further increases the risk of recurrent stroke. This subgroup is also more susceptible to adverse events from anticoagulation, in particular cerebral haemorrhage. This is pertinent since one of warfarin's negative side-effects is bleeding.
This new study by Hans-Christoph Diener, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany, and colleagues, is an analysis of this subgroup. They wanted to see whether the results from this subgroup would be consistent with the main study population.
The team found that warfarin and both dosages of dabigatran were equally effective in preventing stroke or systemic embolism in patients with a previous transient ischaemic attack or stroke. Compared with warfarin, the relative risk stroke or systemic embolism with the 150 mg dose of dabigatran was 0•75 (95% CI 0•52•08) and for the 110 mg dose was 0•84 (95% CI 0•58•20). The rate of major bleeding was significantly lower in patients on 110 mg dabigatran (RR 0•66, 95% CI 0•48•90) and similar in those on 150 mg dabigatran (RR 1•01; 95% CI 0•77•34) compared with those on warfarin. The 110 mg dose of dabigatran was also associated with a significant reduction in the rate of vascular death (RR 0•63, 95% CI 0•43•92) and all-cause mortality (0•70, 0•53•94).
The authors say: "The exact mechanism for the lower rate of intracranial bleeding with dabigatran compared with warfarin, beyond a more stable anticoagulation, is not yet known. One possible explanation is that dabigatran does not cross the blood–brain barrier."
They conclude: "In choosing the dose of dabigatran, physicians need to trade off the benefits of stroke prevention against the risk of haemorrhage. In general, strokes are more severe than major haemorrhages and have more significant long-term consequences. The dose of 150 mg dabigatran twice daily could be preferred to 110 mg twice daily because it significantly reduces the risk of ischaemic stroke without increasing the risk of haemorrhagic stroke."
In an accompanying Comment, Dr Deirdre A Lane and Professor Gregory Y H Lip, at the University of Birmingham Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, UK, say this subgroup analysis is important because "there are very little data on the benefit of oral anticoagulation for secondary stroke prevention, and even less evidence on the safety of oral anticoagulation in this group".
They conclude: "Because of the necessary trade-off between stroke prevention and bleeding with both doses of dabigatran, consultation with patients regarding their preferences for treatment dose will be even more important to ascertain their threshold for stroke prevention over increased bleeding risk or vice versa."
Hans-Christoph Diener, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany. T) +49 201 723 2460 E) h.diener@uni-essen.de
Gregory Y H Lip, University of Birmingham Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, City Hospital, Dudley Road, Birmingham, UK T) +44 121 507 5080 E) g.y.h.lip@bham.ac.uk
For full Article and Comment see: http://press.thelancet.com/tlnrely.pdf
NOTE: THE ABOVE LINK IS FOR JOURNALISTS ONLY; IF YOU WISH TO PROVIDE A LINK TO THE FREE ABSTRACT OF THIS PAPER FOR YOUR READERS, PLEASE USE THE FOLLOWING, WHICH WILL GO LIVE AT THE TIME THE EMBARGO LIFTS: http://www.thelancet.com/journals/laneur/article/PIIS1474-4422(10)70274-X/abstract
Journal
The Lancet Neurology