News Release

Close relationships can perpetuate individual health problems

A couple's shared emotional experiences can affect smoking habits

Peer-Reviewed Publication

Wiley

Tucson, AZ–-March 11, 2009—Human problems rarely occur in a vacuum, but persist as part of ongoing social interaction in which causes and effects are interwoven. One person's behavior can set the stage for what another does. A new study in the journal Family Process reveals that smoking can promote emotional connection for couples when both partners smoke. Health-compromising behaviors, such as smoking or weight gain, may sometimes persist because they preserve stability in a vital close relationship.

Researchers led by Michael J. Rohrbaugh and Varda Shoham of the University of Arizona had 25 couples discuss a health-related disagreement before and during a period of actual smoking, then use joysticks to rate how they had felt from moment to moment (from very positive to very negative) while watching themselves on video. One partner in each couple smoked despite having a heart or lung problem, and in some couples the other partner was a smoker as well.

The joy-stick ratings of partners in dual-smoker couples became more positive and more synchronous contingent upon lighting up – as if they were dancing to the same emotional tune. In single-smoker couples, however, both partners (smokers and non-smokers alike) report decreased positive emotions and less affective synchrony.

While most people think of health-compromising habits like smoking as a purely individual matter of motivation or addiction, this study shows that social factors beyond the smoker are important as well.

Having a partner who also smokes makes a huge difference in how smoking fits the couple's relationship (e.g. as an irritant or an ally), which in turn has implications for helping one or both partners quit.

"Looking beyond the patient can help to predict health outcomes, and relational processes are an important focus for intervention," the authors conclude. "Although prevailing conceptualizations cast nicotine addiction almost exclusively as an 'individual problem,' (findings such as ours) add credence to alternative, more contextual avenues of intervention."

###

This study is published in the March 2009 issue of Family Process. Media wishing to receive a PDF of this article may contact journalnews@bos.blackwellpublishing.net.

Michael J. Rohrbaugh is affiliated with the University of Arizona and can be reached for questions at michaelr@u.arizona.edu.

Family Process is an international, multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal committed to publishing original articles, including theory and practice, philosophical underpinnings, qualitative and quantitative clinical research, and training in couple and family therapy, family interaction, and family relationships with networks and larger systems.

Wiley-Blackwell was formed in February 2007 as a result of the acquisition of Blackwell Publishing Ltd. by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., and its merger with Wiley's Scientific, Technical, and Medical business. Together, the companies have created a global publishing business with deep strength in every major academic and professional field. Wiley-Blackwell publishes approximately 1,400 scholarly peer-reviewed journals and an extensive collection of books with global appeal. For more information on Wiley-Blackwell, please visit www.wiley.com or http://interscience.wiley.com.


Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.