News Release

Is ultrasound as useful as we think?

The usefulness of fetal 'nuchal thickness' as a technique for attempting to diagnose Down's syndrome in obstetric ultrasound is overstated and reliance on this surrogate marker may result in the 'loss' of normal babies

Peer-Reviewed Publication

British Medical Ultrasound Society

The usefulness of foetal 'nuchal thickness' as a technique for attempting to diagnose Down's syndrome in obstetric ultrasound is overstated and reliance on this surrogate marker may result in the 'loss' of normal babies.

In a recent article published in Ultrasound, the Journal of the British Medical Ultrasound Society (Vol. 15, Number 3, 2007), Dr Hylton Meire raises the possibility that ultrasound is not as useful as has been suggested. He particularly emphasises the lack of scientific data to support the use of foetal 'nuchal thickness' measurements in routine clinical ultrasound practice to ascertain the presence of Down's syndrome.

Statement The routine use of ultrasound in obstetrics became commonplace in the years before clinicians tried to ensure that all changes in medical practice were supported by scientifically valid research studies.

The nuchal translucency thickness scan is an ultrasound scan performed between 11 and 13+6 weeks of pregnancy, during which the fluid at the back of the baby’s neck (the nuchal translucency) is measured. Babies with abnormalities tend to accumulate more fluid at the back of their neck during the first trimester, causing this clear space to be larger than average.

Dr Meire reviews the available scientific evidence in support of the routine use of ultrasound as a screening procedure for pregnant women. He concentrates on the ‘routine abnormality scan’, typically performed at 18-20 weeks of pregnancy, and assessment of the foetal ‘nuchal thickness’ performed at 11-13 weeks as a screening procedure for chromosome abnormalities such as Down’s syndrome.

Dr Meire concludes that there is no valid data showing any population benefit from the 18-20 week scan and shows that this position has been agreed by many of the world’s major medical bodies for many years. Several of these bodies have expressed the need for a large confirmatory study but accept that no such study has yet been performed.

Dr Meire also shows that the value of 'nuchal thickness' measurement has probably been overstated and the technique has not been subjected to valid scientific and statistical scrutiny. Using this technique to try to prevent the births of all cases of the two most common chromosome abnormalities in the UK would lead to the loss of 3200 normal babies every year*.

###

(*Birth rate in 2005 722,500 births. Cases of trisomy 18 and 21 0.139% = 1000 cases per year. 160 normals lost for every 50 live birth cases of trisomy 18 or 21 prevented. 1000/50x160 = 3200)

The article is available free online at www.ingentaconnect.com/content/maney/ultra until 30 September 2007.

Dr Hylton B Meire, MBBS, LRCP, MRCS, DObstRCOG, DMRD, FRCR Dr Meire was employed by the Medical Research Council as a full time Consultant in Clinical Ultrasound from 1975 to 1982. From 1982 until his retirement in 2000 he was a Consultant Radiologist with responsibility for the Radiology Ultrasound Service at King’s College Hospital. He was simultaneously Director of Ultrasound at the Portland Hospital for Women and Children, London.

He has published over 150 papers, twelve books and about 60 book chapters on the clinical applications of ultrasound.

He has held positions on the councils of several bodies including Honorary Secretary of the British Institute of Radiology, Treasurer and President of the British Medical Ultrasound Society and Honorary Secretary of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology.

Over the last 20 years he has gained extensive experience as a medical expert witness.

About Ultrasound Ultrasound is an international journal covering all aspects of medical ultrasound from the theoretical to clinical applications and their impact on both workforce and patients. A mixture of invited articles, current research, and descriptions of new techniques and equipment are included, providing both an educational and a scientific role. Ultrasound is published by Maney Publishing on behalf of the British Medical Ultrasound Society. For more information please visit www.maney.co.uk/journals/ultrasound

About the British Medical Ultrasound Society (BMUS) BMUS is a charitable, multi-disciplinary society, whose members are health care professionals and include radiologists, sonographers, obstetricians, physicists, veterinarians and others. BMUS works to advance the science and application of ultrasound in medicine, and to provide education, guidance and information for its members and the public. For more information please visit www.bmus.org or contact Rachel Meir at rachel@bmus.org

About Maney Publishing Maney Publishing was founded in 1900 and has offices in the UK in Leeds and London, and in Cambridge, Massachusetts. With a collection of over 70 journals in materials sciences, the humanities, and healthcare, Maney is committed to publishing high quality journals in print and electronic formats that are international in scope and peer-reviewed. Maney publishes extensively for learned societies, universities and professional bodies. Please visit www.maney.co.uk for more information.


Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.