The findings are reported in the April 4th issue of Current Biology by a team including Robert Hess of McGill University.
Images of everyday scenes are composed of different grades of spatial details--different "spatial frequencies" --that occur at different absolute and relative contrasts. In the study, the researchers asked whether the feedback system that regulates eye growth took into account all this information, or just used a part of it. By presenting young chickens with synthetic images that had similar properties to everyday natural images, the researchers were able to independently manipulate each of these image properties and evaluate the effect on eye growth.
The researchers' first finding was that the different spatial frequencies that occur in images and define localized details, such as edges and lines, are not used by the feedback system to regulate eye growth, despite the fact that these qualities are very important for image recognition. The second finding was that the feedback system does not take into account all grades of spatial detail that are present in a scene, but only the finest detail present, to regulate eye growth. What makes these findings interesting is that our everyday perception of what is blurred is computationally more elaborate than the feedback system, since our sense of blur depends on both local spatial alignments and information across a range of different spatial scales in images. Therefore, the feedback system, which is basically restricted to the eye itself, uses much simpler information than that required by the brain to detect and discriminate image blur. The fact that the eye-growth feedback system uses more primitive information means that images of low contrast are just as effective as blurred images at initiating growth, a conclusion that may have implications for the development of myopia (i.e., short sightedness).
Robert F. Hess of McGill University in Montreal, Canada; Katrina L. Schmid and Darren R. Brinkworth of Queensland University of Technology in Brisbane, Australia; Serge O. Dumoulin of Stanford University in Stanford, CA; David J. Field of Cornell University in Ithaca, NY.
This work was supported by ARC Research Grant number A10024102 to K.L.S. and CIHR (# MT 108-18) grant to R.F.H.
Hess et al.: "What Image Properties Regulate Eye Growth?" Current Biology 16, 687-691, April 4, 2006 DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2006.02.065. www.current-biology.com
Related Dispatch by Schaeffel et al.: "Dispatch: Myopia: The Importance of Seeing Fine Detail."