News Release

Should sun protection factors on sunscreens be abandoned?

Peer-Reviewed Publication

BMJ

Has the sun protection factor had its day?

Click below to download PDF document
You will require Acrobat Reader to view file.
Click here for PDF document

Numerical indicators of sun protection on sunscreen packaging can cause more confusion than clarity in users and this system should be abandoned in favour of terms such as 'low', 'medium' and 'high' protection, suggests Professor Brian Diffey from Newcastle General Hospital in this week's BMJ.

Professor Diffey argues that the numerical indicators are popularly interpreted as how much longer skin covered with sunscreen takes to burn and this encourages prolonged exposure to the sun. Even those people who use high factor sunscreens get sunburnt, says Diffey, but this is because they do not apply enough sunscreen. If sunscreens were applied properly, there would be no need for sun protection factors higher than 15 to prevent sunburn, argues the author.

He concludes that to overcome the confusion caused by the numerical sun protection factors a better system of labelling would be 'low', 'medium', 'high' or 'ultrahigh' - whereby children and people in strong sunshine for many hours use high or ultrahigh protection sunscreen and those who wish to tan or are in shady areas might prefer medium or low protection products. This, says Diffey, would shift the focus more to protection rather than encouraging prolonged exposure to sunlight.

###

Contact:

Professor Brian Diffey, Regional Medical Physics Department, Newcastle General Hospital Tel: +44 (0)191 273 1577
b.l.diffey@ncl.ac.uk


Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.