SAN ANTONIO — For women with metastatic breast cancer who had elevated amounts of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in their blood after a first line of chemotherapy, switching immediately to a different chemotherapy did not improve overall survival or time to progression, according to the results of a phase III clinical trial presented here at the 2013 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, held Dec. 10-14.
"We concluded that CTCs are not a good marker in helping to decide when to switch between chemotherapies," said Jeffrey B. Smerage, M.D., Ph.D., clinical associate professor at the University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center in Ann Arbor. "It had been hoped that switching would both increase the chances of being on an effective therapy and decrease the exposure to toxicity from less effective or ineffective therapies, and as a result it had been hoped that this early switching would result in improved survival and time to progression.
"The most important implication is that we have validated that the group of patients with elevated CTCs at both baseline and 21 days [after starting their first chemotherapy] has a worse prognosis with regard to both time to progression and overall survival," added Smerage. "Although chemotherapy may work for these patients, it clearly does not work as long as one would like. This suggests that this patient population needs more effective treatment options beyond traditional chemotherapy. Given that these patients have higher cancer-related risks, early consideration of clinical trial participation would be appropriate."
About 75 percent of patients with metastatic breast cancer have CTCs detectable in their blood, and the number of CTCs is elevated in about half of these patients. The presence of elevated CTCs in blood indicates poor prognosis and relatively short time to progression, and the goal of this trial was to evaluate if switching to a different chemotherapy is beneficial for patients whose elevated CTCs did not drop after initial chemotherapy.
This trial found that changing therapy for patients with elevated CTCs after one cycle of initial chemotherapy did not improve their overall survival, the primary endpoint of this study.
"An important secondary endpoint was to evaluate whether the levels of CTCs before and after starting a chemotherapy provided prognostic information on how long a patient might live," Smerage said. "This study confirmed that patients who have low numbers of CTCs before starting chemotherapy have a much better survival. They had a median overall survival of 35 months, which means that half of these patients lived three years or longer, and some substantially longer.
"On the other hand, patients for whom CTCs remained elevated after one cycle of chemotherapy had substantially worse survival. They had a median overall survival of only 13 months," he explained. "This suggests that chemotherapy may not be as effective for these cancers in which CTCs remain elevated after one cycle of chemotherapy. This doesn't mean that chemotherapy has no benefit, but it suggests that the benefit is limited."
Smerage and colleagues conducted a prospective, randomized, phase III trial, called the SWOG S0500 trial, to which they recruited 624 patients between 2006 and 2012. All participants had either measurable disease or evaluable disease that included bone metastases.
Of the 595 patients who were eligible for the trial, 276 had low CTCs at baseline, and were observed on arm A. These patients continued to receive the initial chemotherapy.
The remaining 319 patients had elevated CTCs at baseline, and 286 had a CTC result available at day 21 of the first cycle of chemotherapy. At day 21, CTCs decreased to lower levels in 163 patients, who were observed on arm B. These patients continued to receive the initial chemotherapy.
The 123 patients who continued to have elevated CTCs at day 21 were either randomly assigned to arm C1 and continued to receive the initial chemotherapy (64 patients) or were randomly assigned to arm C2 and had their treatment changed to a second-line chemotherapy (59 patients).
"This study was based on counting the number of CTCs in blood," said Smerage. "Several groups are now investigating the presence of biological markers such as estrogen receptor, HER2, and others on CTCs. It is hoped that the measurement of these markers may allow for better prediction of what therapies will work best for these patients."
This study was funded by the National Cancer Institute, and in part by Veridex. Smerage declares no conflicts of interest.
This research will be presented at the 2013 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium Friday, Dec. 13, 7:30 a.m. CT, during a press conference hosted by Peter Ravdin, M.D., Ph.D., clinical professor of oncology, San Antonio, Texas. Press conferences will be held in Room 217D of the Henry B. Gonzalez Convention Center, San Antonio, Texas.
Reporters who cannot attend in person can call into the press conferences using the following information:
- United States/Canada (toll-free): 866-297-6395
- International (toll): 847-944-7317
To interview Jeffrey Smerage, contact Nicole Fawcett at nfawcett@med.umich.edu or 734-764-2220. For other inquiries, contact Jeremy Moore at jeremy.moore@aacr.org or 215-446-7109.
The mission of the 2013 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium is to produce a unique and comprehensive scientific meeting that encompasses the full spectrum of breast cancer research, facilitating the rapid translation of new knowledge into better care for patients with breast cancer. The Cancer Therapy & Research Center (CTRC) at The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), and Baylor College of Medicine are joint sponsors of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium. This collaboration utilizes the clinical strengths of the CTRC and Baylor and the AACR's scientific prestige in basic, translational, and clinical cancer research to expedite the delivery of the latest scientific advances to the clinic. For more information about the symposium, please visit http://www.sabcs.org.
Publication Number: S5-07
Presenter: Jeffrey B. Smerage, M.D., Ph.D.
Title: SWOG S0500 – A randomized phase III trial to test the strategy of changing therapy versus maintaining therapy for metastatic breast cancer patients who have elevated circulating tumor cell (CTC) levels at first follow-up assessment
Authors: Jeffrey B Smerage1, William E Barlow10, Daniel F Hayes1, Eric P Winer3, Brian Leyland-Jones4, Gordan Srkalovic5, Sheela Tejwani7, Ann F Schott1, Mark A O'Rourke6, Danika L Lew10, Julie R Gralow9, Robert B Livingston8 and Gabriel N Hortobagyi2.1University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; 2MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; 3Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; 4Sanford Cancer Center, Sioux Falls, SD; 5Sparrow Health System, Lansing, MI; 6Greenville Health System Cancer Institute, Greenville, SC; 7Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI; 8University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tuscon, AZ; 9University of Washington -Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA and 10SWOG Statistical Center, Seattle, WA.
Introduction: CTC are detectable in approximately 75% of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), and are elevated (≥5CTC/7.5 ml whole blood (WB)) in about half. Elevated CTC at baseline are associated with a worse prognosis, and a decline in CTC levels suggests response to therapy. We initiated a prospective randomized clinical trial (SWOG S0500) to test whether a change in chemotherapy after failure to clear CTC after one cycle of first line chemotherapy would improve outcomes of patients starting first line cytotoxic chemotherapy for MBC.
Methods: Patients initiating first-line chemotherapy for MBC were enrolled. All patients had measurable or evaluable disease that included bone metastases. Patients with elevated CTC at baseline and who continued to have elevated CTC after 21 days of therapy were randomly assigned to either continue initial therapy until progression or to change to a second line chemotherapy (physician choice) immediately at cycle 2. Patients with elevated CTC at baseline, which were not elevated at the 21-day follow-up were maintained on their initial therapy. Patients without elevated CTC at baseline were followed in an observation arm. The primary endpoint was overall survival, and progression-free survival was a secondary endpoint. It was expected that approximately 500-650 patients would have to be screened to enroll 120 patients in the randomized trial. Power was 81% with 2-sided á = 0.05 to detect a 70% increase in median overall survival for patients randomized to change therapy. Three interim analyses were planned during the course of the trial.
Results: From 10/1/2006 until 3/15/2012, 624 patients were registered of whom 612 were eligible. A baseline CTC was obtained in 593 (97%) eligible patients of whom 317 (53%) had elevated CTC at baseline. Thirty-one patients (10%) with elevated baseline CTC did not complete the follow-up CTC due to death, progression, withdrawal, or assay failure. Of the 286 remaining patients, 123 patients (43%) continued to have elevated CTCs after the first cycle of chemotherapy and were randomly assigned to either maintain original chemotherapy (n=64) or switched to new chemotherapy (n=59). Final outcome results will be analyzed in October 2013 and will be reported if released by the SWOG Data Safety Monitoring Board.