Ostrich eggshell (OES) beads from SDG site reflect primordial art and a kind of symbolic behavior of modern humans. Two different manufacturing pathways are usually used in the manufacture of OES beads in Upper Paleolithic. Pathway 1 is identified from these collections; blanks are drilled prior to being trimmed to rough discs. Based on stratigraphic data and OSL dating, these ostrich eggshell beads are probably in Early Holocene ( 10 ka BP).
The study has been reported in Volume 54 Issue 21 (November, 2009) of Chinese Science Bulletin . Academic team led by Prof. Gao Xing of Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences carry out this important research.
The discovery of shell beads from some Paleolithic sites in North Africa and South Africa has been taken as archaeological evidence of the oldest human artistic activity and the earliest record of modern human behavior. Nowadays, the issue of primordial art origins, especially in East Asia, is currently a hot topic in academic world. Paleolithic archaeologists are eagerly searching for new material and dating evidence to solve this research question.
This paper presents a comprehensive production chain for analyzing and rebuilding the manufacture stages of OES beads, concludes some typical characteristics of all different manufacture stages and explores the symbolic meaning of them. Pathway 1 is identified from these collections; blanks are drilled prior to being trimmed to rough discs.
In recent years, many shell beads have been found in some Paleolithic sites, but scholars do not pay more attention to the manufacturing technology of beads and symbolic meaning of them. Based on microscopical observation and experiments, the academic team led by Prof. Gao rebuilt the manufacture stages of OES beads from SDG site, concluded some typical characteristics of all different manufacture stages and explored the symbolic meaning of them.
According to previous observation and study systems of Western scholars and the specific characters of OES beads from SDG site, this study found that the two pathways of manufacture used in SDG site differed in the order of the drilling and trimming stages. The SDG site predominantly shows blanks drilled before trimming – Pathway 1. Blanks trimmed to circular discs prior to drilling constitute Pathway 2. Pathway 1 comprises four activities falling into eight manufacturing stages as follows: 'blank preparation' (Stages I and II), 'drilling' (Stages III and IV), 'trimming' (Stages V and VI), 'grinding' (Stages VII and VIII).
According to observed attributes and analyzing methods, the academic team conducted mass analysis in three aspects: direction of perforation, diameter and area of OES beads, aperture and external diameters of OES beads. OES beads are mainly drilled from inside of beads, followed by both sides, beads drilled from outside surface and uncertain samples are rare. Directions of perforation are in close relationship with the microstructure of OES. The microstructure of OES makes the outside surface more compact and firmer; furthermore, hominids are difficult in finding out appropriate drilling point by reason of the outside slippery surface of OES, breakage generally occurs when drilled from the outside surface of blanks. Thus, hominids are inclined to drill from the inside surface of OES and avoid high rate of breakage. The change of diameter and area indicates a greater degree of uniformity in production; it reflects the excellent skills of prehistoric artisans. Aperture and external diameters of OES beads indicate that the aperture size presents a greater degree of uniformity in Pathway 1; the beads with bigger and more consistently sized aperture could indicate a relatively excellent skill in bead manufacture. Hominids can hold the standard of beads size and make standardized final beads so as to alter and enhance the appearance of the individuals who wear them.
These OES beads play important roles in modern human behavior. According to the ethnological and archaeological materials, if someone wears personal symbolic ornaments, they used to express wearer's some message to a variety of audiences. The ways and decoration people ornament themselves may indicate their ages, group affiliations, marital status, social standing, level of wealth and so on.
"Mass analysis of OES beads in Paleolithic sites has wider application and perspective. Through analyzing the above aspects by experiments and microscopic observation, scholars can reestablish the manufacture stages of OES beads and explore the symbolic meaning of them" said one journal reviewer. "This study concludes some typical characteristics of all different manufacture stages and reflect interactions among existing capacities, changing ecological and demographic conditions." said another reviewer.
Other authors include Zhang Yue, Gao Xing, Zhang Xiaoling and Wang Huimin. We are affiliated at Laboratory of Human Evolution and Archaeometry of Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences. This laboratory is conducting research mainly in six respects: analysis of human evolution, analysis of lithic technology and function; analysis of DNA from ancient human; analysis of ancient materials; zooarchaeology and residue analysis, and paleo-environment analysis.
Funding from the National Basic Research Program of China (Grant No.2006CB806400), Specific Basic Research Program of Ministry of Sciences and Technology of China (Grant No.2007FY110200), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.J0630965) and Knowledge Innovation Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences supported this research.
Reference: Bouzouggara A, Bartonb N, Vanhaerend M, et al. 82000-year-old shell beads from North Africa and implications for the origins of modern human behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007, 104: 9964—9969
http://www.pnas.org/content/104/24/9964
Henshilwood C, d'Errico F, Vanhaeren M, et al. Middle Stone Age shell beads from South Africa. Science, 2004, 304: 404
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/pdf_extract/304/5669/404
Kandel A W, Conard N J. Production sequence of ostrich eggshell beads and settlement dynamics in the Geelbek Dunes of the Western Cape, South Africa. J Archaeol Sci, 2005, 32: 1711—1721
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6WH8-4GRH7BX-2&_user=2001493&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_searchStrId=1111004932&_rerunOrigin=scholar.google&_acct=C000050602&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=2001493&md5=dd65e8583323007002fb2e612faeb7ee
Orton J. Later Stone Age ostrich eggshell bead manufacture in the Northern Cape, South Africa. J Archaeol Sci, 2008, 35: 1765—1775
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6WH8-4RJJRNG-4&_user=2001493&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_searchStrId=1111007018&_rerunOrigin=scholar.google&_acct=C000050602&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=2001493&md5=ca9bc3b6022a721e0430b766cf815f3e
Errico F, Vanhaeren M, Wadley L. Possible shell beads from the Middle Stone Age layers of Sibudu Cave, South Africa. J Archaeol Sci, 2008, 35: 2675—2685
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6WH8-4SGD4X5-1&_user=2001493&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_searchStrId=1111006164&_rerunOrigin=scholar.google&_acct=C000050602&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=2001493&md5=ad57910a0c770619b77f1c060da6a960
Kuhn S L, Stiner M C, David S R, et al. Ornaments of the earliest Upper Paleolithic: New insights from the Levant. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2001, 98: 7641—7646
http://www.pnas.org/content/98/13/7641.abstract
Vanhaeren M, d'Errico F, Stringer C, et al. Middle Paleolithic Shell Beads in Israel and Algeria. Science, 2006, 312: 1785—1788
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/sci;312/5781/1785
McBrearty S, Brooks A S. The revolution that wasn't: a new interpretation of the origin of modern human behavior. J Hum Evol, 2000, 39: 453—563
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6WJS-45F4X3H-7&_user=2001493&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_searchStrId=1111008245&_rerunOrigin=scholar.google&_acct=C000050602&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=2001493&md5=af21b2cf107500cf22cad3c0345a4adb
Ambrose S H. Chronology of the Later Stone Age and Food Production in East Africa. J Archaeol Sci, 1998, 25: 377—392
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6WH8-45J568C-2G&_user=2001493&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_searchStrId=1111010596&_rerunOrigin=scholar.google&_acct=C000050602&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=2001493&md5=26d90adced37565dde63d41d5c4bfac3
Kuhn S L, Stiner M C. Paleolithic Ornaments: Implications for Cognition, Demography and Identity. Diogenes, 2007, 54: 40—48
http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/54/2/40
Journal
Chinese Science Bulletin